From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 1851) id 9400D3858D38; Tue, 8 Nov 2022 11:39:40 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9400D3858D38 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1667907580; bh=dRMgzki1pJkKRJMCzAhKHoy9HOEXgInWiedJz/IKQPQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=KJrCZMmVIO2HZtu7OJtHS71jsDIi4iGyzTFauGEGtKRXsDCkiXOjoIi+yu9N4b5Pu gTRk5SKaI40h7wsRweZKDKHPyukpsLMZXgRDlhklUSzdHRHYjqgMhv542FWd+Kmuih WX8vIpkeJAMPBiYTuShtkzD010P9ZZvZ6YgTIBvE= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Martin Liska To: gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [gcc(refs/users/marxin/heads/sphinx-final)] sphinx: sync latest changes X-Act-Checkin: gcc X-Git-Author: Martin Liska X-Git-Refname: refs/users/marxin/heads/sphinx-final X-Git-Oldrev: 9e20ee6159cc13d70bb1fa780e0c9dff8d21e9d2 X-Git-Newrev: 578d0bdbd6d60bd4e7ad271885e62e024c8e97f6 Message-Id: <20221108113940.9400D3858D38@sourceware.org> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 11:39:40 +0000 (GMT) List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:578d0bdbd6d60bd4e7ad271885e62e024c8e97f6 commit 578d0bdbd6d60bd4e7ad271885e62e024c8e97f6 Author: Martin Liska Date: Mon Nov 7 22:18:24 2022 +0100 sphinx: sync latest changes gcc/ChangeLog: * doc/gccint/target-macros/stack-layout-and-calling-conventions/passing-arguments-in-registers.rst: Port to RST. * doc/gccint/target-macros/storage-layout.rst: Likewise. Diff: --- .../passing-arguments-in-registers.rst | 2 +- gcc/doc/gccint/target-macros/storage-layout.rst | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/doc/gccint/target-macros/stack-layout-and-calling-conventions/passing-arguments-in-registers.rst b/gcc/doc/gccint/target-macros/stack-layout-and-calling-conventions/passing-arguments-in-registers.rst index 6ece8a4577b..8fce5c3403a 100644 --- a/gcc/doc/gccint/target-macros/stack-layout-and-calling-conventions/passing-arguments-in-registers.rst +++ b/gcc/doc/gccint/target-macros/stack-layout-and-calling-conventions/passing-arguments-in-registers.rst @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ the stack. argument :samp:`{libname}` exists for symmetry with ``INIT_CUMULATIVE_ARGS``. - .. could use "this macro" in place of @code{INIT_CUMULATIVE_ARGS}, maybe. + .. could use "this macro" in place of ``INIT_CUMULATIVE_ARGS``, maybe. .. -mew 5feb93 i switched the order of the sentences. -mew 10feb93 diff --git a/gcc/doc/gccint/target-macros/storage-layout.rst b/gcc/doc/gccint/target-macros/storage-layout.rst index bcdc87eecd0..7e6b1c978f6 100644 --- a/gcc/doc/gccint/target-macros/storage-layout.rst +++ b/gcc/doc/gccint/target-macros/storage-layout.rst @@ -217,10 +217,10 @@ See :ref:`run-time-target`. If not defined, the default value is ``STACK_BOUNDARY``. - .. todo:: The default should be @code{PREFERRED_STACK_BOUNDARY}. + .. todo:: The default should be ``PREFERRED_STACK_BOUNDARY``. But the fix for PR 32893 indicates that we can only guarantee - maximum stack alignment on stack up to @code{STACK_BOUNDARY}, not - @code{PREFERRED_STACK_BOUNDARY}, if stack alignment isn't supported. + maximum stack alignment on stack up to ``STACK_BOUNDARY``, not + ``PREFERRED_STACK_BOUNDARY``, if stack alignment isn't supported. .. c:macro:: MAX_OFILE_ALIGNMENT