From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 2093) id A3B933858C62; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 19:12:46 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A3B933858C62 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1674760366; bh=Pabd4IlaWZT5q+tim6Om6iK1zHILaG+rVp6ZwJah3lc=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=pqWZKD7qcEkPWXCPe4GIW7ZZdLMaDNvUYu7AzsKpIluOqdcdmBv/A2pO9Fb4w+QXo F5bx+Z04UebP4Os0/4AghLpRNzfoZkNbxI7r/IQNkYi8dZBOSREA3SdAddIEsLln8P pExM8BKwT4IclmT4vDhTLmVG3luikbmj6fYp9fIo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Kito Cheng To: gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [gcc r13-5413] RISC-V: Rename insn into rinsn for rtx_insn * [NFC] X-Act-Checkin: gcc X-Git-Author: Ju-Zhe Zhong X-Git-Refname: refs/heads/master X-Git-Oldrev: b9b251b7b95c78b485022802908970c598d9f6e1 X-Git-Newrev: 27a2a4b6ed36784cc44e33451eed602f93ef3488 Message-Id: <20230126191246.A3B933858C62@sourceware.org> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 19:12:46 +0000 (GMT) List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:27a2a4b6ed36784cc44e33451eed602f93ef3488 commit r13-5413-g27a2a4b6ed36784cc44e33451eed602f93ef3488 Author: Ju-Zhe Zhong Date: Tue Jan 10 06:56:43 2023 +0800 RISC-V: Rename insn into rinsn for rtx_insn * [NFC] Since the PASS is implemented base on RTL_SSA framework. According to rtl_ssa, they name insn_info * as insn and name rtx_insn * rinsn. I follow this rule in this pass but I missed this function. So rename it to make codes be consistent to RTL_SSA framework. gcc/ChangeLog: * config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc (add_label_notes): Rename insn to rinsn. Diff: --- gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc index f9dd7ca81ba..4c78e58cc28 100644 --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc @@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ insert_vsetvl (enum emit_type emit_type, rtx_insn *rinsn, necessary REG_LABEL_OPERAND and REG_LABEL_TARGET notes. */ static void -add_label_notes (rtx x, rtx_insn *insn) +add_label_notes (rtx x, rtx_insn *rinsn) { enum rtx_code code = GET_CODE (x); int i, j; @@ -700,8 +700,8 @@ add_label_notes (rtx x, rtx_insn *insn) /* There's no reason for current users to emit jump-insns with such a LABEL_REF, so we don't have to handle REG_LABEL_TARGET notes. */ - gcc_assert (!JUMP_P (insn)); - add_reg_note (insn, REG_LABEL_OPERAND, label_ref_label (x)); + gcc_assert (!JUMP_P (rinsn)); + add_reg_note (rinsn, REG_LABEL_OPERAND, label_ref_label (x)); if (LABEL_P (label_ref_label (x))) LABEL_NUSES (label_ref_label (x))++; @@ -712,10 +712,10 @@ add_label_notes (rtx x, rtx_insn *insn) for (i = GET_RTX_LENGTH (code) - 1, fmt = GET_RTX_FORMAT (code); i >= 0; i--) { if (fmt[i] == 'e') - add_label_notes (XEXP (x, i), insn); + add_label_notes (XEXP (x, i), rinsn); else if (fmt[i] == 'E') for (j = XVECLEN (x, i) - 1; j >= 0; j--) - add_label_notes (XVECEXP (x, i, j), insn); + add_label_notes (XVECEXP (x, i, j), rinsn); } }