public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Poulhi?s <dkm@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [gcc r14-1772] ada: Recognize iterated_component_association as potentially unevaluated
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 07:34:41 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230613073441.0EB2F3858404@sourceware.org> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f1e602e9e34e59e1cab44ecf3da72c450a48267

commit r14-1772-g0f1e602e9e34e59e1cab44ecf3da72c450a48267
Author: Piotr Trojanek <trojanek@adacore.com>
Date:   Wed May 3 11:39:52 2023 +0200

    ada: Recognize iterated_component_association as potentially unevaluated
    
    Routine Is_Potentially_Unevaluated was written for Ada 2012, but now we
    use it for Ada 2022 as well, so it must recognize iterated component
    associations (which were added by Ada 2022) as an array component
    association.
    
    gcc/ada/
    
            * sem_util.adb (Is_Potentially_Unevaluated): Recognize iterated
            component association as potentially unevaluated.

Diff:
---
 gcc/ada/sem_util.adb | 14 ++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_util.adb b/gcc/ada/sem_util.adb
index b82978ba99e..23668f1bec5 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/sem_util.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/sem_util.adb
@@ -19566,7 +19566,8 @@ package body Sem_Util is
          elsif Nkind (Par) = N_Quantified_Expression then
             return Expr = Condition (Par);
 
-         elsif Nkind (Par) = N_Component_Association
+         elsif Nkind (Par) in N_Component_Association
+                            | N_Iterated_Component_Association
            and then Expr = Expression (Par)
            and then Nkind (Parent (Par))
               in N_Aggregate | N_Delta_Aggregate | N_Extension_Aggregate
@@ -19708,10 +19709,15 @@ package body Sem_Util is
          then
             return True;
 
-         --  For component associations continue climbing; it may be part of
-         --  an array aggregate.
+         --  For component associations continue climbing; it may be part of an
+         --  array aggregate. For iterated component association we know that
+         --  it belongs to an array aggreate, but only its expression is
+         --  potentially unevaluated, not discrete choice list or iterator
+         --  specification.
 
-         elsif Nkind (Par) = N_Component_Association then
+         elsif Nkind (Par) in N_Component_Association
+                            | N_Iterated_Component_Association
+         then
             null;
 
          --  If the context is not an expression, or if is the result of

                 reply	other threads:[~2023-06-13  7:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230613073441.0EB2F3858404@sourceware.org \
    --to=dkm@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).