public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc r14-1774] ada: Add missing ss_mark/ss_release in quantified expressions
@ 2023-06-13  7:34 Marc Poulhi?s
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Marc Poulhi?s @ 2023-06-13  7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-cvs

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d38366cbaedee32faba1664a8f529875f1128ae5

commit r14-1774-gd38366cbaedee32faba1664a8f529875f1128ae5
Author: Bob Duff <duff@adacore.com>
Date:   Wed May 3 08:42:24 2023 -0400

    ada: Add missing ss_mark/ss_release in quantified expressions
    
    If a quantified expression says "for all ... of F(...)"
    where F(...) is a function call that returns on the secondary
    stack, we need to clean up the secondary stack. This patch
    adds the required ss_mark/ss_release in that case.
    
    gcc/ada/
    
            * exp_ch4.adb
            (Expand_N_Quantified_Expression): Detect the secondary-stack
            case, and find the innermost scope where we should mark/release,
            and Set_Uses_Sec_Stack on that. Skip intermediate blocks and loops
            that are part of expansion.

Diff:
---
 gcc/ada/exp_ch4.adb | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gcc/ada/exp_ch4.adb b/gcc/ada/exp_ch4.adb
index fdaeb50512f..7b6e997e3e7 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/exp_ch4.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/exp_ch4.adb
@@ -11116,6 +11116,32 @@ package body Exp_Ch4 is
          Freeze_Before (P, Etype (Var));
       end;
 
+      --  For an expression of the form "for all/some X of F(...) => ...",
+      --  where F(...) is a function call that returns on the secondary stack,
+      --  we need to mark an enclosing scope as Uses_Sec_Stack. We must do
+      --  this before expansion, which can obscure the tree. Note that we
+      --  might be inside another quantified expression. Skip blocks and
+      --  loops that were generated by expansion.
+
+      if Present (Iterator_Specification (N))
+        and then Nkind (Name (Iterator_Specification (N))) = N_Function_Call
+        and then Needs_Secondary_Stack
+                   (Etype (Name (Iterator_Specification (N))))
+      then
+         declare
+            Source_Scope : Entity_Id := Current_Scope;
+         begin
+            while Ekind (Source_Scope) in E_Block | E_Loop
+              and then not Comes_From_Source (Source_Scope)
+            loop
+               Source_Scope := Scope (Source_Scope);
+            end loop;
+
+            Set_Uses_Sec_Stack (Source_Scope);
+            Check_Restriction (No_Secondary_Stack, N);
+         end;
+      end if;
+
       --  Create the declaration of the flag which tracks the status of the
       --  quantified expression. Generate:

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2023-06-13  7:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-06-13  7:34 [gcc r14-1774] ada: Add missing ss_mark/ss_release in quantified expressions Marc Poulhi?s

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).