[gcc r14-3012] [Committed] Avoid FAIL of gcc.target/i386/pr110792.c

[gcc r14-3012] [Committed] Avoid FAIL of gcc.target/i386/pr110792.c

[Roger Sayle]

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:529909f9e92dd3b0ed0383f45a44d2b5f8a58958

commit r14-3012-g529909f9e92dd3b0ed0383f45a44d2b5f8a58958
Author: Roger Sayle <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
Date:   Sun Aug 6 23:19:10 2023 +0100

    [Committed] Avoid FAIL of gcc.target/i386/pr110792.c
    
    My apologies (again), I managed to mess up the 64-bit version of the
    test case for PR 110792.  Unlike the 32-bit version, the 64-bit case
    contains exactly the same load instructions, just in a different order
    making the correct and incorrect behaviours impossible to distinguish
    with a scan-assembler-not.  Somewhere between checking that this test
    failed in a clean tree without the patch, and getting the escaping
    correct, I'd failed to notice that this also FAILs in the patched tree.
    Doh!  Instead of removing the test completely, I've left it as a
    compilation test.
    
    The original fix is tested by the 32-bit test case.
    
    Committed to mainline as obvious.  Sorry for the incovenience.
    
    2023-08-06  Roger Sayle  <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
    
    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
            PR target/110792
            * gcc.target/i386/pr110792.c: Remove dg-final scan-assembler-not.

Diff:
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr110792.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr110792.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr110792.c
index b65125c48b6..eea4e1877db 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr110792.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr110792.c
@@ -15,4 +15,3 @@ unsigned __int128 whirl(unsigned char x0)
    asm("":::"memory");
    return tt;
 }
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "movq\tWHIRL_S\\+8\\(%rdi\\), %rdi" } } */