public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc r14-3718] c++: improve verify_constant diagnostic [PR91483]
@ 2023-09-05 18:30 Marek Polacek
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Marek Polacek @ 2023-09-05 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-cvs

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b78cedc6b5bc062717a3e0efb10da8e19af1c422

commit r14-3718-gb78cedc6b5bc062717a3e0efb10da8e19af1c422
Author: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Sep 1 17:26:01 2023 -0400

    c++: improve verify_constant diagnostic [PR91483]
    
    When verify_constant complains, it's pretty terse.  Consider
    
      void test ()
      {
        constexpr int i = 42;
        constexpr const int *p = &i;
      }
    
    where it says "'& i' is not a constant expression".  OK, but why?
    
    With this patch, we say:
    
    b.C:5:28: error: '& i' is not a constant expression
        5 |   constexpr const int *p = &i;
          |                            ^~
    b.C:5:28: note: pointer to 'i' is not a constant expression
    b.C:4:17: note: address of non-static constexpr variable 'i' may differ on each invocation of the enclosing function; add 'static' to give it a constant address
        4 |   constexpr int i = 42;
          |                 ^
          |                 static
    
    which brings g++ on par with clang++.
    
            PR c++/91483
    
    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
    
            * constexpr.cc (verify_constant_explain_r): New.
            (verify_constant): Call it.
    
    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
    
            * g++.dg/diagnostic/constexpr3.C: New test.

Diff:
---
 gcc/cp/constexpr.cc                          | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/constexpr3.C | 33 +++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
index 8bd5c4a47f81..0ca4370deab7 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
@@ -3381,6 +3381,61 @@ ok:
     }
 }
 
+/* *TP was not deemed constant by reduced_constant_expression_p.  Explain
+   why and suggest what could be done about it.  */
+
+static tree
+verify_constant_explain_r (tree *tp, int *walk_subtrees, void *)
+{
+  bool ref_p = false;
+
+  /* No need to look into types or unevaluated operands.  */
+  if (TYPE_P (*tp) || unevaluated_p (TREE_CODE (*tp)))
+    {
+      *walk_subtrees = false;
+      return NULL_TREE;
+    }
+
+  switch (TREE_CODE (*tp))
+    {
+    CASE_CONVERT:
+      if (TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (*tp, 0)) != ADDR_EXPR)
+	break;
+      ref_p = TYPE_REF_P (TREE_TYPE (*tp));
+      *tp = TREE_OPERAND (*tp, 0);
+      gcc_fallthrough ();
+    case ADDR_EXPR:
+      {
+	tree op = TREE_OPERAND (*tp, 0);
+	if (VAR_P (op)
+	    && DECL_DECLARED_CONSTEXPR_P (op)
+	    && !TREE_STATIC (op)
+	    /* ??? We should also say something about temporaries.  */
+	    && !DECL_ARTIFICIAL (op))
+	  {
+	    if (ref_p)
+	      inform (location_of (*tp), "reference to %qD is not a constant "
+		      "expression", op);
+	    else
+	      inform (location_of (*tp), "pointer to %qD is not a constant "
+		      "expression", op);
+	    const location_t op_loc = DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (op);
+	    rich_location richloc (line_table, op_loc);
+	    richloc.add_fixit_insert_before (op_loc, "static ");
+	    inform (&richloc,
+		    "address of non-static constexpr variable %qD may differ on "
+		    "each invocation of the enclosing function; add %<static%> "
+		    "to give it a constant address", op);
+	  }
+	break;
+      }
+    default:
+      break;
+    }
+
+  return NULL_TREE;
+}
+
 /* Some expressions may have constant operands but are not constant
    themselves, such as 1/0.  Call this function to check for that
    condition.
@@ -3398,7 +3453,13 @@ verify_constant (tree t, bool allow_non_constant, bool *non_constant_p,
       && t != void_node)
     {
       if (!allow_non_constant)
-	error ("%q+E is not a constant expression", t);
+	{
+	  auto_diagnostic_group d;
+	  error_at (cp_expr_loc_or_input_loc (t),
+		    "%q+E is not a constant expression", t);
+	  cp_walk_tree_without_duplicates (&t, verify_constant_explain_r,
+					   nullptr);
+	}
       *non_constant_p = true;
     }
   if (TREE_OVERFLOW_P (t))
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/constexpr3.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/constexpr3.C
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..39ddf01a73c6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/constexpr3.C
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+// PR c++/91483
+// { dg-do compile { target c++14 } }
+
+struct X {
+  int const& var;
+};
+
+struct A {
+  A *ap = this;
+};
+
+constexpr A
+foo ()
+{
+  return {};
+}
+
+void
+test ()
+{
+  constexpr int i = 42; // { dg-message "may differ on each invocation" }
+
+  constexpr X x{i}; // { dg-error "not a constant expression" }
+  // { dg-message "reference to .i. is not a constant expression" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+  constexpr const int *p = &i; // { dg-error "not a constant expression" }
+  // { dg-message "pointer to .i. is not a constant expression" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+
+  constexpr A a = foo (); // { dg-error "not a constant expression" }
+  // { dg-message "pointer to .a. is not a constant expression|may differ" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+
+  constexpr const int *q = __builtin_launder (&i); // { dg-error "not a constant expression" }
+  // { dg-message "pointer to .i. is not a constant expression" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+}

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2023-09-05 18:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-09-05 18:30 [gcc r14-3718] c++: improve verify_constant diagnostic [PR91483] Marek Polacek

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).