public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Meissner <meissner@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [gcc(refs/users/meissner/heads/work139)] PowerPC: Do not depend on an undefined shift
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 04:49:52 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231012044952.8E0473858D1E@sourceware.org> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:49fb3f85c907777381cc5dde79dda2fc90c8dc9c

commit 49fb3f85c907777381cc5dde79dda2fc90c8dc9c
Author: Michael Meissner <meissner@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu Oct 12 00:49:35 2023 -0400

    PowerPC: Do not depend on an undefined shift
    
    I was building a cross compiler to PowerPC on my x86_86 workstation with the
    latest version of GCC on October 11th.  I could not build the compiler on the
    x86_64 system as it died in building libgcc.  I looked into it, and I
    discovered the compiler was recursing until it ran out of stack space.  If I
    build a native compiler with the same sources on a PowerPC system, it builds
    fine.
    
    I traced this down to a change made around October 10th:
    
    | commit 8f1a70a4fbcc6441c70da60d4ef6db1e5635e18a (HEAD)
    | Author: Jiufu Guo <guojiufu@linux.ibm.com>
    | Date:   Tue Jan 10 20:52:33 2023 +0800
    |
    |   rs6000: build constant via li/lis;rldicl/rldicr
    |
    |   If a constant is possible left/right cleaned on a rotated value from
    |   a negative value of "li/lis".  Then, using "li/lis ; rldicl/rldicr"
    |   to build the constant.
    
    The code was doing a -1 << 64 which is undefined behavior because different
    machines produce different results.  On the x86_64 system, (-1 << 64) produces
    -1 while on a PowerPC 64-bit system, (-1 << 64) produces 0.  The x86_64 then
    recurses until the stack runs out of space.
    
    If I apply this patch, the compiler builds fine on both x86_64 as a PowerPC
    crosss compiler and on a native PowerPC system.
    
    2023-10-12  Michael Meissner  <meissner@linux.ibm.com>
    
    gcc/
    
            PR target/111778
            * config/rs6000/rs6000.cc (can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicl): Protect
            code from shifts that are undefined.
            (can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicr): Likewise.
            (can_be_built_by_li_and_rldic): Likewise.

Diff:
---
 gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
index 2828f01413c..cc24dd5301e 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
@@ -10370,6 +10370,11 @@ can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicl (HOST_WIDE_INT c, int *shift,
   /* Leading zeros may be cleaned by rldicl with a mask.  Change leading zeros
      to ones and then recheck it.  */
   int lz = clz_hwi (c);
+
+  /* If lz == 0, the left shift is undefined.  */
+  if (!lz)
+    return false;
+
   HOST_WIDE_INT unmask_c
     = c | (HOST_WIDE_INT_M1U << (HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT - lz));
   int n;
@@ -10398,6 +10403,11 @@ can_be_built_by_li_lis_and_rldicr (HOST_WIDE_INT c, int *shift,
   /* Tailing zeros may be cleaned by rldicr with a mask.  Change tailing zeros
      to ones and then recheck it.  */
   int tz = ctz_hwi (c);
+
+  /* If tz == HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT, the left shift is undefined.  */
+  if (tz >= HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT)
+    return false;
+
   HOST_WIDE_INT unmask_c = c | ((HOST_WIDE_INT_1U << tz) - 1);
   int n;
   if (can_be_rotated_to_lowbits (~unmask_c, 15, &n)
@@ -10428,8 +10438,15 @@ can_be_built_by_li_and_rldic (HOST_WIDE_INT c, int *shift, HOST_WIDE_INT *mask)
      right bits are shifted as 0's, and left 1's(and x's) are cleaned.  */
   int tz = ctz_hwi (c);
   int lz = clz_hwi (c);
+
+  /* If lz == HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT, the left shift is undefined.  */
+  if (lz >= HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT)
+    return false;
+
   int middle_ones = clz_hwi (~(c << lz));
-  if (tz + lz + middle_ones >= ones)
+  if (tz + lz + middle_ones >= ones
+      && (tz - lz) < HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT
+      && tz < HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT)
     {
       *mask = ((1LL << (HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT - tz - lz)) - 1LL) << tz;
       *shift = tz;
@@ -10440,7 +10457,8 @@ can_be_built_by_li_and_rldic (HOST_WIDE_INT c, int *shift, HOST_WIDE_INT *mask)
   int leading_ones = clz_hwi (~c);
   int tailing_ones = ctz_hwi (~c);
   int middle_zeros = ctz_hwi (c >> tailing_ones);
-  if (leading_ones + tailing_ones + middle_zeros >= ones)
+  if (leading_ones + tailing_ones + middle_zeros >= ones
+      && middle_zeros < HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT)
     {
       *mask = ~(((1ULL << middle_zeros) - 1ULL) << tailing_ones);
       *shift = tailing_ones + middle_zeros;
@@ -10450,10 +10468,15 @@ can_be_built_by_li_and_rldic (HOST_WIDE_INT c, int *shift, HOST_WIDE_INT *mask)
   /* xx1..1xx: --> xx0..01..1xx: some 1's(following x's) are cleaned. */
   /* Get the position for the first bit of successive 1.
      The 24th bit would be in successive 0 or 1.  */
-  HOST_WIDE_INT low_mask = (1LL << 24) - 1LL;
+  HOST_WIDE_INT low_mask = (HOST_WIDE_INT_1U << 24) - HOST_WIDE_INT_1U;
   int pos_first_1 = ((c & (low_mask + 1)) == 0)
 		      ? clz_hwi (c & low_mask)
 		      : HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT - ctz_hwi (~(c | low_mask));
+
+  /* Make sure the left and right shifts are defined.  */
+  if (!IN_RANGE (pos_first_1, 1, HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT-1))
+    return false;
+
   middle_ones = clz_hwi (~c << pos_first_1);
   middle_zeros = ctz_hwi (c >> (HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT - pos_first_1));
   if (pos_first_1 < HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT

             reply	other threads:[~2023-10-12  4:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-12  4:49 Michael Meissner [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-10-16 18:24 Michael Meissner
2023-10-16 18:23 Michael Meissner
2023-10-16 18:23 Michael Meissner
2023-10-12 21:54 Michael Meissner
2023-10-12 21:54 Michael Meissner
2023-10-12  4:07 Michael Meissner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231012044952.8E0473858D1E@sourceware.org \
    --to=meissner@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).