[gcc(refs/users/aoliva/heads/testme)] testsuite: arm: fix arm_movt cut&pasto

[Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@gcc.gnu.org>]

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:47c3446bd87091babe7a03e61f5857a846ea61b9

commit 47c3446bd87091babe7a03e61f5857a846ea61b9
Author: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com>
Date:   Sun Nov 19 02:41:48 2023 -0300

    testsuite: arm: fix arm_movt cut&pasto
    
    I got spurious fails of tests that required arm_thumb1_movt_ok on a
    target cpu that did not support movt.  Looking into it, I found the
    arm_movt property to have been cut&pasted into various procs that
    checked for different properties.  They shouldn't share the same test
    results cache entry, so I'm changing their prop names.
    
    
    for  gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    
            * lib/target-supports.exp
            (check_effective_target_arm_thumb1_cbz_ok): Fix prop name
            cut&pasto.
            (check_effective_target_arm_arch_v6t2_hw_ok): Likewise.

Diff:
---
 gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
index 240a3815d38..e3519207d0e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
@@ -5610,7 +5610,7 @@ proc check_effective_target_arm_thumb1_movt_ok {} {
 
 proc check_effective_target_arm_thumb1_cbz_ok {} {
     if [check_effective_target_arm_thumb1_ok] {
-	return [check_no_compiler_messages arm_movt object {
+	return [check_no_compiler_messages arm_cbz object {
 	    int
 	    foo (void)
 	    {
@@ -5627,7 +5627,7 @@ proc check_effective_target_arm_thumb1_cbz_ok {} {
 
 proc check_effective_target_arm_arch_v6t2_hw_ok {} {
     if [check_effective_target_arm_thumb1_ok] {
-	return [check_no_compiler_messages arm_movt object {
+	return [check_no_compiler_messages arm_v6t2_hw object {
 	    int
 	    main (void)
 	    {