public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc r14-6042] lower-bitint: Fix _BitInt .{ADD, SUB}_OVERFLOW lowering [PR112750]
@ 2023-12-01  8:27 Jakub Jelinek
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2023-12-01  8:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-cvs

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:364332658ef790d09d250db39c5b13e27c3543f1

commit r14-6042-g364332658ef790d09d250db39c5b13e27c3543f1
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Dec 1 09:25:45 2023 +0100

    lower-bitint: Fix _BitInt .{ADD,SUB}_OVERFLOW lowering [PR112750]
    
    The .{ADD,SUB}_OVERFLOW lowering is implemented by performing normal
    addition/subtraction (perhaps extended to even more bits than normally by
    continuing with extended values of operands after running of normal bits)
    and in addition to that trying to compute if certain sets of bits are either
    all zero or all sign extensions of the least significant bit.
    
    That code is in a lot of cases guarded just by a single condition (which
    can be idx > startlimb, idx >= startlimb or idx == startlimb) or by
    2 conditions - if (idx >= startlimb) { if (idx == startlimb) ... else ... }
    Now, if_then_if_then_else when the second argument is NULL works just as
    if_then and sets m_gsi to be within the initially empty then block and that is
    where we emit code for constant tidx startlimb + (cmp_code == GT_EXPR).
    But in the 2 conditions case, m_gsi is set to the initially empty else
    block, so using EQ_EXPR for the condition was incorrect (and strangely
    nothing in the testsuite caught that), because the code for extracting the
    lowest set of bits (i.e. when tidx is startlimb) is then done when idx
    is not startlimb rather than when it is.
    The following patch fixes that.
    
    Note, when developing the lowering, I was using gcov to make sure all code
    is covered by the testsuite with minimum exceptions, so no idea how this
    slipped out.
    
    2023-12-01  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
    
            PR middle-end/112750
            * gimple-lower-bitint.cc (bitint_large_huge::lower_addsub_overflow):
            Use NE_EXPR rather than EQ_EXPR for g2 if !single_comparison and
            adjust probabilities.
    
            * gcc.dg/bitint-41.c: Use -std=c23 rather than -std=c2x.
            * gcc.dg/torture/bitint-43.c: Likewise.
            * gcc.dg/torture/bitint-44.c: Likewise.
            * gcc.dg/torture/bitint-45.c: New test.

Diff:
---
 gcc/gimple-lower-bitint.cc               |  4 ++--
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/bitint-41.c         |  2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/bitint-43.c |  2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/bitint-44.c |  2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/bitint-45.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/gimple-lower-bitint.cc b/gcc/gimple-lower-bitint.cc
index 5024815ed9d..09eb7a34e91 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-lower-bitint.cc
+++ b/gcc/gimple-lower-bitint.cc
@@ -4028,11 +4028,11 @@ bitint_large_huge::lower_addsub_overflow (tree obj, gimple *stmt)
 		  edge edge_true_true, edge_true_false, edge_false;
 		  gimple *g2 = NULL;
 		  if (!single_comparison)
-		    g2 = gimple_build_cond (EQ_EXPR, idx,
+		    g2 = gimple_build_cond (NE_EXPR, idx,
 					    size_int (startlimb), NULL_TREE,
 					    NULL_TREE);
 		  if_then_if_then_else (g, g2, profile_probability::likely (),
-					profile_probability::unlikely (),
+					profile_probability::likely (),
 					edge_true_true, edge_true_false,
 					edge_false);
 		  unsigned tidx = startlimb + (cmp_code == GT_EXPR);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/bitint-41.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/bitint-41.c
index d87ea08bdf6..f97f03cd091 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/bitint-41.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/bitint-41.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 /* PR middle-end/112336 */
 /* { dg-do compile { target bitint } } */
-/* { dg-options "-std=c2x" } */
+/* { dg-options "-std=c23" } */
 
 unsigned _BitInt(1) v1;
 unsigned _BitInt(1) *p1 = &v1;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/bitint-43.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/bitint-43.c
index 4265bffef70..a45f5c6b493 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/bitint-43.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/bitint-43.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 /* PR c/111309 */
 /* { dg-do run { target bitint } } */
-/* { dg-options "-std=c2x -pedantic-errors" } */
+/* { dg-options "-std=c23 -pedantic-errors" } */
 /* { dg-skip-if "" { ! run_expensive_tests }  { "*" } { "-O0" "-O2" } } */
 /* { dg-skip-if "" { ! run_expensive_tests } { "-flto" } { "" } } */
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/bitint-44.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/bitint-44.c
index 938c0e917f3..fe5c1685387 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/bitint-44.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/bitint-44.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 /* PR c/111309 */
 /* { dg-do run { target bitint } } */
-/* { dg-options "-std=c2x -pedantic-errors" } */
+/* { dg-options "-std=c23 -pedantic-errors" } */
 /* { dg-skip-if "" { ! run_expensive_tests }  { "*" } { "-O0" "-O2" } } */
 /* { dg-skip-if "" { ! run_expensive_tests } { "-flto" } { "" } } */
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/bitint-45.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/bitint-45.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..50c622d83d4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/bitint-45.c
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+/* PR middle-end/112750 */
+/* { dg-do run { target bitint } } */
+/* { dg-options "-std=c23 -pedantic-errors" } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "" { ! run_expensive_tests }  { "*" } { "-O0" "-O2" } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "" { ! run_expensive_tests } { "-flto" } { "" } } */
+
+#if __BITINT_MAXWIDTH__ >= 256
+_BitInt(256) a = __INT_MAX__ + (_BitInt(256)) 1;
+_BitInt(256) b = __INT_MAX__;
+#endif
+#if __BITINT_MAXWIDTH__ >= 512
+_BitInt(512) c = 0x7fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffwb + (_BitInt(512)) 1;
+_BitInt(512) d = 0x7fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffwb;
+#endif
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+#if __BITINT_MAXWIDTH__ >= 256
+  if (!__builtin_sub_overflow_p (a, 0, 0))
+    __builtin_abort ();
+  if (!__builtin_sub_overflow_p (b, -1, 0))
+    __builtin_abort ();
+#endif
+#if __BITINT_MAXWIDTH__ >= 512
+  if (!__builtin_sub_overflow_p (c, 0, (_BitInt(160)) 0))
+    __builtin_abort ();
+  if (!__builtin_sub_overflow_p (d, -1, 0))
+    __builtin_abort ();
+#endif
+  return 0;
+}

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2023-12-01  8:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-12-01  8:27 [gcc r14-6042] lower-bitint: Fix _BitInt .{ADD, SUB}_OVERFLOW lowering [PR112750] Jakub Jelinek

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).