public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [gcc r14-9258] c++: Fix up decltype of non-dependent structured binding decl in template [PR92687]
Date: Fri,  1 Mar 2024 16:28:13 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240301162813.ABE893858C66@sourceware.org> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:867cbadb912ab75d0eaf919a3f992595e508482b

commit r14-9258-g867cbadb912ab75d0eaf919a3f992595e508482b
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Mar 1 16:59:08 2024 +0100

    c++: Fix up decltype of non-dependent structured binding decl in template [PR92687]
    
    finish_decltype_type uses DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P (expr) check for
    DECL_DECOMPOSITION_P (expr) to determine if it is
    array/struct/vector/complex etc. subobject proxy case vs. structured
    binding using std::tuple_{size,element}.
    For non-templates or when templates are already instantiated, that works
    correctly, finalized DECL_DECOMPOSITION_P non-base vars indeed have
    DECL_VALUE_EXPR in the former case and don't have it in the latter.
    It works fine for dependent structured bindings as well, cp_finish_decomp in
    that case creates DECLTYPE_TYPE tree and defers the handling until
    instantiation.
    As the testcase shows, this doesn't work for the non-dependent structured
    binding case in templates, because DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P is set in that case
    always; cp_finish_decomp ends with:
      if (processing_template_decl)
        {
          for (unsigned int i = 0; i < count; i++)
            if (!DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P (v[i]))
              {
                tree a = build_nt (ARRAY_REF, decl, size_int (i),
                                   NULL_TREE, NULL_TREE);
                SET_DECL_VALUE_EXPR (v[i], a);
                DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P (v[i]) = 1;
              }
        }
    and those artificial ARRAY_REFs are used in various places during
    instantiation to find out what base the DECL_DECOMPOSITION_P VAR_DECLs
    have and their positions.
    
    The following patch fixes that by changing lookup_decomp_type, such that
    it doesn't ICE when called on a DECL_DECOMPOSITION_P var which isn't in a
    hash table, but returns NULL_TREE in that case, and for processing_template_decl
    asserts DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P is non-NULL and just calls lookup_decomp_type.
    If it returns non-NULL, it is a structured binding using tuple and its result
    is returned, otherwise it falls through to returning unlowered_expr_type (expr)
    because it is an array, structure etc. subobject proxy.
    For !processing_template_decl it keeps doing what it did before,
    DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P meaning it is an array/structure etc. subobject proxy,
    otherwise the tuple case.
    
    2024-03-01  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
    
            PR c++/92687
            * decl.cc (lookup_decomp_type): Return NULL_TREE if decomp_type_table
            doesn't have entry for V.
            * semantics.cc (finish_decltype_type): If ptds.saved, assert
            DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P is true and decide on tuple vs. non-tuple based
            on if lookup_decomp_type is NULL or not.
    
            * g++.dg/cpp1z/decomp59.C: New test.

Diff:
---
 gcc/cp/decl.cc                        |  4 ++-
 gcc/cp/semantics.cc                   |  9 +++++
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/decomp59.C | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.cc b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
index 05e4600c7bb..993d7ef4d2b 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/decl.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
@@ -9262,7 +9262,9 @@ static GTY((cache)) decl_tree_cache_map *decomp_type_table;
 tree
 lookup_decomp_type (tree v)
 {
-  return *decomp_type_table->get (v);
+  if (tree *slot = decomp_type_table->get (v))
+    return *slot;
+  return NULL_TREE;
 }
 
 /* Mangle a decomposition declaration if needed.  Arguments like
diff --git a/gcc/cp/semantics.cc b/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
index 57840176863..adb1ba48d29 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
@@ -11804,6 +11804,15 @@ finish_decltype_type (tree expr, bool id_expression_or_member_access_p,
 	 access expression).  */
       if (DECL_DECOMPOSITION_P (expr))
 	{
+	  if (ptds.saved)
+	    {
+	      gcc_checking_assert (DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P (expr));
+	      /* DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P is always set if
+		 processing_template_decl.  If lookup_decomp_type
+		 returns non-NULL, it is the tuple case.  */
+	      if (tree ret = lookup_decomp_type (expr))
+		return ret;
+	    }
 	  if (DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P (expr))
 	    /* Expr is an array or struct subobject proxy, handle
 	       bit-fields properly.  */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/decomp59.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/decomp59.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..52a72fa9c08
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/decomp59.C
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+// PR c++/92687
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-options "" }
+
+namespace std {
+  template<typename T> struct tuple_size;
+  template<int, typename> struct tuple_element;
+}
+
+struct A {
+  int i;
+  template <int I> int& get() { return i; }
+};
+
+template<> struct std::tuple_size<A> { static const int value = 2; };
+template<int I> struct std::tuple_element<I,A> { using type = int; };
+
+template<typename T>
+struct is_reference {
+  static const bool value = false;
+};
+
+template<typename T>
+struct is_reference<T&>
+{
+  static const bool value = true;
+};
+
+template<typename T>
+struct is_reference<T&&>
+{
+  static const bool value = true;
+};
+
+template<int N>
+void
+foo ()
+{
+  auto [x, y] = A {};	// { dg-warning "structured bindings only available with" "" { target c++14_down } }
+  static_assert (!is_reference<decltype (x)>::value, "");
+}
+
+void
+bar ()
+{
+  auto [x, y] = A {};	// { dg-warning "structured bindings only available with" "" { target c++14_down } }
+  static_assert (!is_reference<decltype (x)>::value, "");
+}
+
+template<typename T>
+void
+baz ()
+{
+  auto [x, y] = T {};	// { dg-warning "structured bindings only available with" "" { target c++14_down } }
+  static_assert (!is_reference<decltype (x)>::value, "");
+}
+
+void
+qux ()
+{
+  foo<0> ();
+  baz<A> ();
+}

                 reply	other threads:[~2024-03-01 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240301162813.ABE893858C66@sourceware.org \
    --to=jakub@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).