public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [gcc r14-10046] c-family: Allow arguments with NULLPTR_TYPE as sentinels [PR114780]
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 22:13:21 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240419221321.2497F3849ACF@sourceware.org> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2afdecccbaf5c5b1c7a235509b37092540906c02

commit r14-10046-g2afdecccbaf5c5b1c7a235509b37092540906c02
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Sat Apr 20 00:12:36 2024 +0200

    c-family: Allow arguments with NULLPTR_TYPE as sentinels [PR114780]
    
    While in C++ the ellipsis argument conversions include
    "An argument that has type cv std::nullptr_t is converted to type void*"
    in C23 a nullptr_t argument is not promoted in any way, but va_arg
    description says:
    "the type of the next argument is nullptr_t and type is a pointer type that has the same
    representation and alignment requirements as a pointer to a character type."
    So, while in C++ check_function_sentinel will never see NULLPTR_TYPE, for
    C23 it can see that and currently we incorrectly warn about those.
    
    The only question is whether we should warn on any argument with
    nullptr_t type or just about nullptr (nullptr_t argument with integer_zerop
    value).  Through undefined behavior guess one could pass non-NULL pointer
    that way, say by union { void *p; nullptr_t q; } u; u.p = &whatever;
    and pass u.q to ..., but valid code should always pass something that will
    read as (char *) 0 when read using va_arg (ap, char *), so I think it is
    better not to warn rather than warn in those cases.
    
    Note, clang seems to pass (void *)0 rather than expression of nullptr_t
    type to ellipsis in C23 mode as if it did the C++ ellipsis argument
    conversions, in that case guess not warning about that would be even safer,
    but what GCC does I think follows the spec more closely, even when in a
    valid program one shouldn't be able to observe the difference.
    
    2024-04-20  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
    
            PR c/114780
            * c-common.cc (check_function_sentinel): Allow as sentinel any
            argument of NULLPTR_TYPE.
    
            * gcc.dg/format/sentinel-2.c: New test.

Diff:
---
 gcc/c-family/c-common.cc                 |  1 +
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/format/sentinel-2.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-common.cc b/gcc/c-family/c-common.cc
index 6fa8243b02b..01e3d247fc2 100644
--- a/gcc/c-family/c-common.cc
+++ b/gcc/c-family/c-common.cc
@@ -5783,6 +5783,7 @@ check_function_sentinel (const_tree fntype, int nargs, tree *argarray)
       sentinel = fold_for_warn (argarray[nargs - 1 - pos]);
       if ((!POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (sentinel))
 	   || !integer_zerop (sentinel))
+	  && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (sentinel)) != NULLPTR_TYPE
 	  /* Although __null (in C++) is only an integer we allow it
 	     nevertheless, as we are guaranteed that it's exactly
 	     as wide as a pointer, and we don't want to force
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/format/sentinel-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/format/sentinel-2.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4c29f6fb818
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/format/sentinel-2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+/* PR c/114780 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-std=c23 -Wformat" } */
+
+#include <stddef.h>
+
+[[gnu::sentinel]] void foo (int, ...);
+[[gnu::sentinel]] void bar (...);
+
+void
+baz (nullptr_t p)
+{
+  foo (1, 2, nullptr);
+  foo (3, 4, 5, p);
+  bar (nullptr);
+  bar (p);
+  foo (6, 7, 0);	// { dg-warning "missing sentinel in function call" }
+  bar (0);		// { dg-warning "missing sentinel in function call" }
+  foo (8, 9, NULL);
+  bar (NULL);
+}

                 reply	other threads:[~2024-04-19 22:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240419221321.2497F3849ACF@sourceware.org \
    --to=jakub@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-cvs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).