public inbox for gcc-cvs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gcc r15-342] RISC-V: Make full-vec-move1.c test robust for optimization
@ 2024-05-09 10:48 Pan Li
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Pan Li @ 2024-05-09 10:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-cvs
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b1520d2260c5e0cfcd7a4354fab70f66e2912ff2
commit r15-342-gb1520d2260c5e0cfcd7a4354fab70f66e2912ff2
Author: Pan Li <pan2.li@intel.com>
Date: Thu May 9 10:56:46 2024 +0800
RISC-V: Make full-vec-move1.c test robust for optimization
During investigate the support of early break autovec, we notice
the test full-vec-move1.c will be optimized to 'return 0;' in main
function body. Because somehow the value of V type is compiler
time constant, and then the second loop will be considered as
assert (true).
Thus, the ccp4 pass will eliminate these stmt and just return 0.
typedef int16_t V __attribute__((vector_size (128)));
int main ()
{
V v;
for (int i = 0; i < sizeof (v) / sizeof (v[0]); i++)
(v)[i] = i;
V res = v;
for (int i = 0; i < sizeof (v) / sizeof (v[0]); i++)
assert (res[i] == i); // will be optimized to assert (true)
}
This patch would like to introduce a extern function to use the res[i]
that get rid of the ccp4 optimization.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/full-vec-move1.c:
Introduce extern func use to get rid of ccp4 optimization.
Signed-off-by: Pan Li <pan2.li@intel.com>
Diff:
---
.../gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/full-vec-move1.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/full-vec-move1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/full-vec-move1.c
index d73bad4af6f7..fae2ae91572f 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/full-vec-move1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/full-vec-move1.c
@@ -2,11 +2,12 @@
/* { dg-additional-options "-std=c99 -O3 -march=rv64gcv_zvl128b -mabi=lp64d -fno-vect-cost-model -mrvv-vector-bits=zvl" } */
#include <stdint-gcc.h>
-#include <assert.h>
/* This would cause us to emit a vl1r.v for VNx4HImode even when
the hardware vector size vl > 64. */
+extern int16_t test_element (int16_t);
+
typedef int16_t V __attribute__((vector_size (128)));
int main ()
@@ -14,9 +15,10 @@ int main ()
V v;
for (int i = 0; i < sizeof (v) / sizeof (v[0]); i++)
(v)[i] = i;
+
V res = v;
for (int i = 0; i < sizeof (v) / sizeof (v[0]); i++)
- assert (res[i] == i);
+ test_element (res[i]);
}
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {vl[1248]r.v} } } */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2024-05-09 10:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-05-09 10:48 [gcc r15-342] RISC-V: Make full-vec-move1.c test robust for optimization Pan Li
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).