public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Built GCC 3.0! now installing it, ok! but i don't see it....
@ 2001-07-12  5:37 Marco
  2001-07-12 13:58 ` Alexandre Oliva
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marco @ 2001-07-12  5:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-help

 hi all,
 
 it's the first time i recompile a copiler.
 i already have gcc 2.96-81 on a Linux RH7.1
 
 i read the installation info, so :
 i CONFIGUREd in a new DIR to keep source and build code separated.
 then i MAKE BOOTSTRAP. ok...only some normal (i hope) warnings...but no
 errors.
 then i try MAKE INSTALL. it works without any error.
 
 but now when i launch gcc -v i get the old version in response [2.96-81].
 is it only a ~~~/specs problem or an installation error? how to check the
 right version.
 [when i look at the gcc file date i get today one!]
 
 thanx
 Marco


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Built GCC 3.0! now installing it, ok! but i don't see it....
  2001-07-12  5:37 Built GCC 3.0! now installing it, ok! but i don't see it Marco
@ 2001-07-12 13:58 ` Alexandre Oliva
  2001-07-13  1:09   ` Marco
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Oliva @ 2001-07-12 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marco; +Cc: gcc-help

On Jul 12, 2001, "Marco" <gottini@bsecure.it> wrote:

>  but now when i launch gcc -v i get the old version in response [2.96-81].

Check your PATH.  The newly-installed GCC will be in /usr/local/bin,
unless you specified a different --prefix.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Built GCC 3.0! now installing it, ok! but i don't see it....
  2001-07-12 13:58 ` Alexandre Oliva
@ 2001-07-13  1:09   ` Marco
  2001-07-13 12:40     ` Alexandre Oliva
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marco @ 2001-07-13  1:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: egcs; +Cc: gcc-help

> >  but now when i launch gcc -v i get the old version in response
[2.96-81].
>
> Check your PATH.  The newly-installed GCC will be in /usr/local/bin,
> unless you specified a different --prefix.

Yes. i have it in /usr/local/bin. if i start it with full path it works!!!
now, may i uninstall the old one? (in /usr/bin)
or is there any problem?

thx very much
 Marco

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Built GCC 3.0! now installing it, ok! but i don't see it....
  2001-07-13  1:09   ` Marco
@ 2001-07-13 12:40     ` Alexandre Oliva
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Oliva @ 2001-07-13 12:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marco; +Cc: gcc-help

On Jul 13, 2001, "Marco" <gottini@bsecure.it> wrote:

> Yes. i have it in /usr/local/bin. if i start it with full path it works!!!

Then you have to modify the PATH variable in your environment to get
/usr/local/bin/gcc found before /usr/bin/gcc

> now, may i uninstall the old one? (in /usr/bin)

It's not always a good idea.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2001-07-13 12:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-07-12  5:37 Built GCC 3.0! now installing it, ok! but i don't see it Marco
2001-07-12 13:58 ` Alexandre Oliva
2001-07-13  1:09   ` Marco
2001-07-13 12:40     ` Alexandre Oliva

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).