From: "ERICSON, MATHEW (A-Australia, ex1)" <mathew_ericson@agilent.com>
To: "'richy.boy@clara.co.uk'" <richy.boy@clara.co.uk>,
"ERICSON, MATHEW (A-Australia, ex1)" <mathew_ericson@agilent.com>
Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: GCC 3.0 HP-UX 11.00 64bit Build Instructions
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 06:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <050F1F49D79BD3118F3B0090278CB91802C9058A@apmail7.aus.agilent.com> (raw)
Richard,
Solved this one - however libstd++v3 still failed due to the pow() duplicate
declaration. This is a known problem but the patch code I found in the
mailing lists seems to differ from current code in cvs for inclhack.def
Did you apply the patch to your inclhack.def to get this to build?
Thanks
mathew
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Davies [ mailto:richy.boy@clara.co.uk ]
Sent: Friday, 20 July 2001 11:33 PM
To: ERICSON,MATHEW (A-Australia,ex1)
Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: GCC 3.0 HP-UX 11.00 64bit Build Instructions
> Another question though - which version of gcc-3.0 are you building?
The
> original release has the ltconfig error determining maximum length of
> command line arguments.
>
Yes, I'm using the original release. I rarely breath near the
development branch because things do tend to break unexpectedly. I just
let ltconfig break, then manually add the command line length argument
to the config cache file, so make will resume from where it left off.
> I am currently synced to gcc-3.0-branch but this does not build
failing
> during stage1 with:
>
> ./genflags /usr/local/src/gcc-snapshot/gcc_snapshot/gcc/gcc/config/pa/
pa
> .md > tmp-flags.h
> /bin/sh /usr/local/src/gcc-snapshot/gcc_snapshot/gcc/gcc/move-if-
change
> tmp-flags.h insn-flags.h
> echo timestamp > s-flags
> (cd /usr/local/src/gcc-snapshot/gcc_snapshot/gcc/gcc && false -o c-p$
$.
> c c-parse.y && \
> mv -f c-p$$.c c-parse.c)
> *** Error exit code 1
> Stop.
> *** Error exit code 1
> Stop.
> *** Error exit code 1
> Stop.
>
> Thanks again
> mathew
>
I'm afraid I can't really help there, maybe Olivia will have some gem
of wisdom.
I would guess something stupid and completely wrong that yacc hasn't
generated the correct file or something of that ilk, but unless I cvs
checkout out the branch (I won't be doing that) I won't have any real
idea of what is wrong.
--
--
RichyBoy
next reply other threads:[~2001-07-20 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-20 6:36 ERICSON, MATHEW (A-Australia, ex1) [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-20 6:32 Richard Davies
2001-07-20 4:48 ERICSON, MATHEW (A-Australia, ex1)
2001-07-20 4:37 ERICSON, MATHEW (A-Australia, ex1)
2001-07-20 1:29 Richard Davies
2001-07-19 18:16 ERICSON, MATHEW (A-Australia, ex1)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=050F1F49D79BD3118F3B0090278CB91802C9058A@apmail7.aus.agilent.com \
--to=mathew_ericson@agilent.com \
--cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=richy.boy@clara.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).