public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ERICSON, MATHEW (A-Australia, ex1)" <mathew_ericson@agilent.com>
To: "'richy.boy@clara.co.uk'" <richy.boy@clara.co.uk>,
	"ERICSON, MATHEW (A-Australia, ex1)" <mathew_ericson@agilent.com>
Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: GCC 3.0 HP-UX 11.00 64bit Build Instructions
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 06:36:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <050F1F49D79BD3118F3B0090278CB91802C9058A@apmail7.aus.agilent.com> (raw)

Richard,

Solved this one - however libstd++v3 still failed due to the pow() duplicate
declaration. This is a known problem but the patch code I found in the
mailing lists seems to differ from current code in cvs for inclhack.def 
Did you apply the patch to your inclhack.def to get this to build? 

Thanks
mathew

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Davies [ mailto:richy.boy@clara.co.uk ] 
Sent: Friday, 20 July 2001 11:33 PM
To: ERICSON,MATHEW (A-Australia,ex1)
Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: GCC 3.0 HP-UX 11.00 64bit Build Instructions


> Another question though - which version of gcc-3.0 are you building? 
The
> original release has the ltconfig error determining maximum length of


> command line arguments. 
> 

Yes, I'm using the original release. I rarely breath near the 
development branch because things do tend to break unexpectedly. I just 
let ltconfig break, then manually add the command line length argument 
to the config cache file, so make will resume from where it left off.


> I am currently synced to gcc-3.0-branch but this does not build 
failing
> during stage1 with:
> 
> ./genflags /usr/local/src/gcc-snapshot/gcc_snapshot/gcc/gcc/config/pa/
pa
> .md > tmp-flags.h
> /bin/sh /usr/local/src/gcc-snapshot/gcc_snapshot/gcc/gcc/move-if-
change
> tmp-flags.h insn-flags.h
> echo timestamp > s-flags
> (cd /usr/local/src/gcc-snapshot/gcc_snapshot/gcc/gcc && false  -o c-p$
$.
> c c-parse.y && \
> mv -f c-p$$.c c-parse.c)
> *** Error exit code 1
> Stop.
> *** Error exit code 1
> Stop.
> *** Error exit code 1
> Stop.
> 
> Thanks again
> mathew
> 

I'm afraid I can't really help there, maybe Olivia will have some gem 
of wisdom. 

I would guess something stupid and completely wrong that yacc hasn't 
generated the correct file or something of that ilk, but unless I cvs 
checkout out the branch (I won't be doing that) I won't have any real 
idea of what is wrong.

-- 
-- 

RichyBoy

             reply	other threads:[~2001-07-20  6:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-07-20  6:36 ERICSON, MATHEW (A-Australia, ex1) [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-20  6:32 Richard Davies
2001-07-20  4:48 ERICSON, MATHEW (A-Australia, ex1)
2001-07-20  4:37 ERICSON, MATHEW (A-Australia, ex1)
2001-07-20  1:29 Richard Davies
2001-07-19 18:16 ERICSON, MATHEW (A-Australia, ex1)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=050F1F49D79BD3118F3B0090278CB91802C9058A@apmail7.aus.agilent.com \
    --to=mathew_ericson@agilent.com \
    --cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=richy.boy@clara.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).