public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* RE: Prefix command with gcc-2.95
@ 2003-02-05  9:28 Roger.Gough
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Roger.Gough @ 2003-02-05  9:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Rupert Wood', 'Roger.Gough'; +Cc: 'Gcc Help (E-mail)'

Thanks Rup for your reply.

	Yes everything you said I have done. However I was getting an error
with the Make command. If it does not build fully does that mean I will not
see any files in the directory I set as my prefix? I definetely dont see any
files in my prefix directory after I do my configuration. At the moment I am
not too bothered about the make error, I just want to get the prefix command
working. Thanks again.

Roger.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rupert Wood [mailto:me@rupey.net]
Sent: 04 February 2003 18:12
To: 'Roger.Gough'
Cc: 'Gcc Help (E-mail)'
Subject: RE: Prefix command with gcc-2.95


Roger Gough wrote:

> I am having some problems using the prefix command with gcc version
> 2.95. With the command:
>
>	--prefix=dirname. 
>
> This command should specify the toplevel installation directory.
> This does not seem to work for me.

It's always worked here. Can I verify you're adding this to the
configure line for a source-code distribution of GCC, i.e. you've done
something like

      gzip -cd gcc-2.95.3.tar.gz |tar xvf -
      mkdir build
      cd build
      ../gcc-2.95.3/configure --prefix=/my/install/path

followed by 'make bootstrap', 'make install', etc.? It's not a parameter
for the gcc executable, nor is it a standalone command.

Rup.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* RE: Prefix command with gcc-2.95
@ 2003-02-05  9:34 Bhattiprolu Ravikumar-A18658
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bhattiprolu Ravikumar-A18658 @ 2003-02-05  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Roger.Gough'; +Cc: 'Gcc Help (E-mail)'

Hi Roger,

  You will not see any files under your prefix directory till you complete 
"make install".

"make bootstrap" will just build the compiler in the directory in which you have configured and "make install" will transfer all the required files for using gcc/g++ into the directory specified by --prefix option.

hope this helps.
regards,
Ravi

-----Original Message-----
From: Roger.Gough [mailto:Roger.Gough@ul.ie]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 2:55 PM
To: 'Rupert Wood'; 'Roger.Gough'
Cc: 'Gcc Help (E-mail)'
Subject: RE: Prefix command with gcc-2.95


Thanks Rup for your reply.

	Yes everything you said I have done. However I was getting an error
with the Make command. If it does not build fully does that mean I will not
see any files in the directory I set as my prefix? I definetely dont see any
files in my prefix directory after I do my configuration. At the moment I am
not too bothered about the make error, I just want to get the prefix command
working. Thanks again.

Roger.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rupert Wood [mailto:me@rupey.net]
Sent: 04 February 2003 18:12
To: 'Roger.Gough'
Cc: 'Gcc Help (E-mail)'
Subject: RE: Prefix command with gcc-2.95


Roger Gough wrote:

> I am having some problems using the prefix command with gcc version
> 2.95. With the command:
>
>	--prefix=dirname. 
>
> This command should specify the toplevel installation directory.
> This does not seem to work for me.

It's always worked here. Can I verify you're adding this to the
configure line for a source-code distribution of GCC, i.e. you've done
something like

      gzip -cd gcc-2.95.3.tar.gz |tar xvf -
      mkdir build
      cd build
      ../gcc-2.95.3/configure --prefix=/my/install/path

followed by 'make bootstrap', 'make install', etc.? It's not a parameter
for the gcc executable, nor is it a standalone command.

Rup.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* RE: Prefix command with gcc-2.95
       [not found] <616BE6A276E3714788D2AC35C40CD18DA26EB0@whale.softwire.co.uk>
@ 2003-02-04 18:11 ` Rupert Wood
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rupert Wood @ 2003-02-04 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Roger.Gough'; +Cc: 'Gcc Help (E-mail)'

Roger Gough wrote:

> I am having some problems using the prefix command with gcc version
> 2.95. With the command:
>
>	--prefix=dirname. 
>
> This command should specify the toplevel installation directory.
> This does not seem to work for me.

It's always worked here. Can I verify you're adding this to the
configure line for a source-code distribution of GCC, i.e. you've done
something like

      gzip -cd gcc-2.95.3.tar.gz |tar xvf -
      mkdir build
      cd build
      ../gcc-2.95.3/configure --prefix=/my/install/path

followed by 'make bootstrap', 'make install', etc.? It's not a parameter
for the gcc executable, nor is it a standalone command.

Rup.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Prefix command with gcc-2.95
@ 2003-02-04 18:03 Roger.Gough
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Roger.Gough @ 2003-02-04 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gcc Help (E-mail)

Hi All,

  I am having some problems using the prefix command with gcc version 2.95.
With the command:

	--prefix=dirname. 

This command should specify the toplevel installation directory. This does
not seem to work for me. Has anybody else experienced similar problems?
Thanks in advance.

Rgds

Roger.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-02-05  9:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-02-05  9:28 Prefix command with gcc-2.95 Roger.Gough
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-05  9:34 Bhattiprolu Ravikumar-A18658
     [not found] <616BE6A276E3714788D2AC35C40CD18DA26EB0@whale.softwire.co.uk>
2003-02-04 18:11 ` Rupert Wood
2003-02-04 18:03 Roger.Gough

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).