public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: Bamboozled by long long
@ 2002-07-19 13:11 arijitg
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: arijitg @ 2002-07-19 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-help

I tried running it on my system with both options.
 llx works while LX does not.

My system is sunOS5.7 just in case.

thanks guys for the prompt and right response. :)

---------Included Message----------
>Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 12:31:23 -0700
>From: "Gokhan Kisacikoglu" <kisa@centropolisfx.com>
>Reply-To: <kisa@centropolisfx.com>
>To: "John Love-Jensen" <eljay@adobe.com>
>Cc: <arijitg@uci.edu>, <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
>Subject: Re: Bamboozled by long long
>
>
>> unsigned long long k=1;
>> unsigned int i = 4;
>> printf("The values are i: %d, , k: %LX, i+k: %LX \n", i,k , i+k);
>> k = k + i;
>> printf("The values are i: %d, , k: %LX, i+k: %LX \n", i,k , i+k);
>> 
>> ...depending on the extension (or convention for long long) used.
>> 
>> --Eljay
>
>
>This is not correct, this will only work with double precision float
>numbers. "long long" is really "long long int" and only ll should be
>used. This is from the man page (on my system):
>
>        ll   For n, the argument has type pointer to long long int; 
for
>d
>             and i, long long int; and for o, u, x, and X, unsigned 
long
>             long int.
>
>        L    For b, B, e, E, f, g, and G, the argument has type long
>             double.
>
>
---------End of Included Message----------


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Bamboozled by long long
@ 2002-07-19 11:17 arijitg
  2002-07-19 12:16 ` John Love-Jensen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: arijitg @ 2002-07-19 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-help

 I have the following 2 lines in a program

 unsigned long long k=1;
 unsigned int i = 4;

 printf("The values are i: %d, , k: %lX, i+k: %lX \n", i,k , i+k);
 k = k + i;
 printf("The values are i: %d, , k: %lX, i+k: %lX \n", i,k , i+k);

I get the foll. outputs:

The values are i: 4, , k: 0, i+k: 1
The values are i: 4, , k: 0, i+k: 5

Note that (i+k) is showing k's current value, yet k is always showing 
0.

Any idea please?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-07-19 21:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-07-19 13:11 Bamboozled by long long arijitg
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-19 11:17 arijitg
2002-07-19 12:16 ` John Love-Jensen
2002-07-19 12:29   ` Gokhan Kisacikoglu
2002-07-19 14:22   ` Leo Przybylski

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).