* to include or not to include..
@ 2003-01-30 10:27 Christian Schaefer
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Christian Schaefer @ 2003-01-30 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-help
hi there,
I am currently developing some small little app for the linux
environment, which I am not too familiar with but start to like it.
I recognized the following.
using gcc 3.2 I compile a source using 'strcpy()'.
if I do not include the string.h header file, it gives me a warning
but compiles with no error. if I do include it, I get no warning but the
size of the executable is much bigger.
I guess this means, that the needed libraries are linked at runtime if
not static and I wonder what is faster?
when its loaded on runtime it may gets cached, doesn't it?
*wonder*
regards
/christian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-01-30 10:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-30 10:27 to include or not to include Christian Schaefer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).