From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-help-return-27910-listarch-gcc-help=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29583 invoked by alias); 15 May 2007 11:49:08 -0000
Received: (qmail 29571 invoked by uid 22791); 15 May 2007 11:49:07 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from kuber.nabble.com (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 May 2007 11:49:04 +0000
Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) 	by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) 	(envelope-from <lists@nabble.com>) 	id 1HnvWY-0007vB-Fc 	for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 04:49:02 -0700
Message-ID: <10621291.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 11:49:00 -0000
From: kushwaha <vaibhav.kushwaha@gmail.com>
To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: errors in porting on gcc 3.4.6 from gcc 3.2.3
In-Reply-To: <f2c4l1$dup$1@sea.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Nabble-From: vaibhav.kushwaha@gmail.com
References: <10620590.post@talk.nabble.com> <f2c4l1$dup$1@sea.gmane.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-help.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg00146.txt.bz2


yes.. the code is correct and getting compiled on gcc 3.2.3. i just want to
know is there is any option to avoid that strict checking on gcc 3.4.6 as i
can't change the code.




Lionel B wrote:
>=20
> On Tue, 15 May 2007 03:47:03 -0700, kushwaha wrote:
>=20
>> hi all..
>>=20
>> Following is the part of a code giving error with gcc 3.4.6  which
>> previously compiled with gcc 3.2.3.
>=20
> Are you sure...? Compiling your code (gcc 4.1.2) I get:
>=20
> error: =E2=80=98class HString_Key=E2=80=99 has no member named =E2=80=98m=
pcCallId=E2=80=99
> error: =E2=80=98class HString_Key=E2=80=99 has no member named =E2=80=98m=
ulHashId=E2=80=99
>=20
> from these lines:
>=20
>     key.mpcCallId =3D apcCallId;
>     key.mulHashId =3D apcHashId;
>=20
> and sure enough, your class template HString_Key does not contain those=20
> members. I don't see how this could have compiled with gcc 3.2.3. Didn't=
=20
> you mean:
>=20
>     key.mpcId =3D apcCallId;
>     key.mulId =3D apcHashId;
>=20
> in Equal_to_HString_Key::Equal_to_HString_Key(...) ? Compiles ok for me=20
> with this change.
>=20
> [...]
>=20
> --=20
> Lionel B
>=20
>=20
>=20

--=20
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/errors-in-porting-on-gc=
c-3.4.6-from-gcc-3.2.3-tf3757763.html#a10621291
Sent from the gcc - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.