public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Timothy C Prince" <tprince@myrealbox.com>
To: monodhs@gmx.de
Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: GCC-provided runtime libraries.
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:27:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1181848423.c7e69e9ctprince@myrealbox.com> (raw)



-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Böhme <monodhs@gmx.de>
To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 16:41:43 +0200
Subject: GCC-provided runtime libraries.

Hello all,

I am currently trying to install the 4.2.0 version of GCC on a
Linux system that has not seen much administration work over the past
years.  This system has an old and broken (apparently misadminstered)
version of g++ installed that is not usable.  It also happens that
said system has some commercial production software on it which is
not available in source form.  Since I am not going to want to do a
full bootstrap of the whole system, let alone experimenting with
(in)compatibilities of versions of all sorts of runtime libraries
(eg, libc, libstdc++) with said software, the logical approach would
be to install the new compiler in a separate location that is to use
the binutils, runtime linker and libc of the system.

The problem here is that this new compiler with its updated/
improved/bug-less runtime libraries (such as libgcc_s.so,
libstdc++.so, libgfortran.so) does not explicitly tell the linker
to link against them (or set DT_RUNPATH in the resulting executables
accordingly) but to use what is setup by the sysadmin (via /etc/ld.so.conf
and friends).  Consequently, I reverted back to configuring with static
runtime libraries which even more surprisingly yielded the same result.
It appears that g++ only passes a lone -lstdc++ to the linker
but not the path where GCC supposedly installed its own sparkly
new libraries (either shared or static).

While it would certainly be _possible_ to set LD_RUN_PATH to the
location of the libraries during link time, it nevertheless is tedious
to do so for every invokation.  It would, of course, require knowledge
about their exact location in the filesysytem which is definitely not
what every user should be expected to know.

What I want is that executables compiled with the new compiler
shall be linked against the new runtime libraries installed with
that compiler while existing software is to use the existing runtime
libraries.

Is there a way to do that without hacking the GCC sources ?

The system in question uses a SUSE Linux distribution.

These are the config options:

$ ../<gcc-src>/configure \
--with-gmp-include=<some-path>/include \
--with-gmp-lib=<some-path>/lib64 \
--with-mpfr-include=<some-path>/include \
--with-mpfr-lib=<some-path>/lib64 \
--disable-shared \
--enable-version-specific-runtime-libs \
--enable-threads=posix \
--enable-tls \
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran \
--enable-__cxa_atexit \
--with-gxx-include-dir=<some-path>/include/C++ \
--with-long-double-128 \
--enable-decimal-float \
--with-arch=opteron \
--with-cpu=opteron \
--with-tune=opteron \
--disable-libssp \
--disable-libgomp \
--disable-checking \
--enable-bootstrap \
x86_64-generic-linux

-----------------------------------------------
When you add the --prefix option to specify the install path, your newly built g++ should put the corresponding library directories at the top of its search path:
/yourinstallpath/bin/g++ -print-search-dirs

You will have to put the corresponding library path in the front of LD_LIBRARY_PATH in order for the corresponding .so libraries to be used at run time.

Tim Prince

             reply	other threads:[~2007-06-14 19:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-15  0:27 Timothy C Prince [this message]
2007-06-15  7:44 ` Christian Böhme
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-15 12:55 Nick Maclaren
2007-06-14 19:01 Christian Böhme
2007-06-15  9:50 ` Kai Ruottu
2007-06-15 12:16 ` Andrew Haley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1181848423.c7e69e9ctprince@myrealbox.com \
    --to=tprince@myrealbox.com \
    --cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=monodhs@gmx.de \
    --cc=tprince@computer.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).