From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7271 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2008 08:31:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 7259 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Aug 2008 08:31:41 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from warsl404pip5.highway.telekom.at (HELO email.aon.at) (195.3.96.77) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 08:30:52 +0000 Received: (qmail 9490 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2008 08:30:48 -0000 Received: from 212-183-77-52.adsl.highway.telekom.at (HELO [10.0.0.1]) ([212.183.77.52]) (envelope-sender ) by smarthub92.highway.telekom.at (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 4 Aug 2008 08:30:48 -0000 Subject: Re: how to configure for 64bit default on ia64-hp-hpux11* From: Michael Haubenwallner To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <1215523497.21100.30.camel@sapc154.salomon.at> References: <1215523497.21100.30.camel@sapc154.salomon.at> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 08:31:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1217838647.7598.20.camel@salomon-22> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2 No response after ~1 month - please tell if wrong list (which one instead?), thanks! (more thoughts below) On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 15:24 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > Hi, > > when building for ia64-hp-hpux11*, the default output type is 32bit. > > While this is a multilib-compiler by default, I'd like to > --disable-multilib, and use different target triplets instead of > compiler flags, very similar to these ones: > > 32bit 64bit > i?86-pc-linux-gnu x86_64-pc-linux-gnu > i386-sun-solaris2* x86_64-sun-solaris2* > sparc-sun-solaris2* sparcv9-sun-solaris2* > hppa2.0*-hp-hpux11* hppa64-hp-hpux11* > powerpc-ibm-aix5* powerpc64-ibm-aix5* > ppc-*-linux-gnu ppc64-*-linux-gnu > ia64-*-linux-gnu > > Now, what could be the 64bit target triplet for ia64-hpux ? > > 32bit 64bit > ia64-hp-hpux11* ia64_64-hp-hpux11* > > Or should 'ia64-hp-hpux11*' be changed to default to 64bit, and > introduce some new 'ia64_32-hp-hpux11*' instead ? > > 32bit 64bit > ia64_32-hp-hpux11* ia64-hp-hpux11* What about these names, inspired by hppa2.0n/hppa2.0w: ia64-hp-hpux11*: default 32bit, keep as-is ia64n-hp-hpux11*: default 32bit, eventually new for completeness ia64w-hp-hpux11*: default 64bit, new Thoughts? Thanks! /haubi/