From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mengyan1223.wang (mengyan1223.wang [89.208.246.23]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C7783857C4A for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 15:41:34 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 7C7783857C4A Received: from [IPv6:240e:358:1104:b400:dc73:854d:832e:3] (unknown [IPv6:240e:358:1104:b400:dc73:854d:832e:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: xry111@mengyan1223.wang) by mengyan1223.wang (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CDD8B66344; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 11:41:30 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <12a5e21f1432b767709e423315fb8081e4e447bd.camel@mengyan1223.wang> Subject: Re: Multiple descriptions for fassert in gcc/d/lang.opt and gcc/java/lang.opt From: Xi Ruoyao To: Zopolis0 , gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 23:41:20 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.44.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3031.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-help mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 15:41:36 -0000 On Tue, 2022-03-29 at 19:11 +1100, Zopolis0 via Gcc-help wrote: > While trying to compile gcc with gcj re-added, it breaks on there being > multiple declarations of fassert in gcc/d/lang.opt and gcc/java/lang.opt. Is there a project adding gcj back to GCC? If yes, it's better to discuss in gcc@gcc.gnu.org. gcc-help is generally for "help in building or using GCC." Otherwise, you can't just inject some code died five years ago into the current GCC tree and expect it to work. --=20 Xi Ruoyao School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University