From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19235 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2013 17:39:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19226 invoked by uid 89); 17 Dec 2013 17:39:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_FAIL,URI_HEX autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: sam.nabble.com Received: from sam.nabble.com (HELO sam.nabble.com) (216.139.236.26) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 17:39:51 +0000 Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VsycX-0006HI-32 for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 09:39:49 -0800 Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 17:39:00 -0000 From: ballsystemlord To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Message-ID: <1387301988872-996338.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1384976790125-987688.post@n5.nabble.com> Subject: Re: A few Qs on the -Wfoo options MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg00118.txt.bz2 Ok, I've reread them. I could not find the definition of some of them because they are only mentioned int the info manual under their '--no-' counterparts, so when I searched for them with grep (because I did not remember seeing them before because they were not there,) nothing came up. I'm still interested in learning a little more about a few though. -Wimplicit-interface What's an explicit interface? -Wimplicit-procedure What's an explicit interface? -Winvalid-memory-model I could not find it mentioned in the info manual. -Wcharacter-truncation "Warn when a character assignment will truncate the assigned string." How can a string be truncated? -Wlogical-op Why would it give false positives? What's the criteria under which it makes these assumptions? -Wstack-protector How can a function get smashed? -- View this message in context: http://gcc.1065356.n5.nabble.com/A-few-Qs-on-the-Wfoo-options-tp987688p996338.html Sent from the gcc - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.