Re[2]: 2.95.2 libraries donŽt link using 3.x

["Miguel Angel Núñez" <miguel.nunez@datatronics.es>]

Hola Oscar,

Yes, I was talking about C++. Upps, I forgot to mention it.

My problem is that the 2.95.2 libraries are comercial ones, so I don't
have the source code. I only have the binaries. The vovida source code
does not compile using gcc lower than 3.x.

I'm afraid I will have to produce 2 executables and communicate them
in any way.

There is not really any way to link 2.x and 3.x binaries together in
the same executable? This is my last chance, and I will not ask any
more ;-)


Thanks a lot Oscar!!




Thursday, July 18, 2002, 7:23:45 PM, usted escribió:

OF> Miguel Angel Núñez <miguel.nunez@datatronics.es> writes:

>> Hello GCC experts,
>> 
>> I hope you can help me in this link problem that I donÂŽt know how to
>> solve.
>> 
>> I'm using some libraries that were developed for GCC 2.95.2. I was
>> using GCC 2.95.3 and everything was fine. My application was compiled
>> and linked perfectly.
>> 
>> Now I have to use GCC 3.x because of some source code I'm including
>> from www.vovida.org that needs this version of GCC. The application
>> is compiled, but at link time I get a lot of errors about undefined
>> symbols (all of them in the libraries for 2.95.2).
>> 
>> My question:
>>   Is there any modifier for having backwards compatibility? Compile
>>   3.x code, and link against 3.x libraries and 2.95.2 libraries.
>> 
>>   Is this possible?

OF> I guess you are talking about C++ (remember: GCC is 5 languages or so)

OF> The C++ ABI changed on gcc 3.0.x The new ABI and the previous one are
OF> incompatible.
 
>> 
>> Any other idea about how to overcome this problem is very welcome.

OF> You must re-build all your libraries with gcc 3.x if you want to use
OF> it. Those binaries will not be compatible with gcc < 3.0