From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 503 invoked by alias); 14 May 2007 09:18:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 488 invoked by uid 22791); 14 May 2007 09:18:37 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 May 2007 09:18:35 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l4E9IWsQ014080 for ; Mon, 14 May 2007 05:18:32 -0400 Received: from zebedee.littlepinkcloud.COM (vpn-14-106.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.106]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l4E9ITjU019606; Mon, 14 May 2007 05:18:30 -0400 Received: from littlepinkcloud.COM (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zebedee.littlepinkcloud.COM (8.13.8/8.13.5) with ESMTP id l4E9IRpD006554; Mon, 14 May 2007 10:18:27 +0100 Received: (from aph@localhost) by littlepinkcloud.COM (8.13.8/8.13.5/Submit) id l4E9IQfd006551; Mon, 14 May 2007 10:18:26 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17992.10594.536861.703629@zebedee.pink> Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 09:18:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley To: Claus Fischer Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Likely code generation bug in GCC 4.0.1 In-Reply-To: <20070513221443.GA3660@clausfischer.com> References: <20070513221443.GA3660@clausfischer.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.93.1 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg00128.txt.bz2 Claus Fischer writes: > > I think I found a code generation bug in GCC 4.0.1. > > I'm sending this mail to make sure this bug is known and > is or will be removed in newer versions. > On a quick glance I couldn't find it in the bug database, > so it may not be known. Redirected to gcc-help. Please send a full test case that can be run, with full information about the expected effect. Thanks, Andrew.