* Compiling GCC 2.95.1
@ 1999-11-13 16:27 Zakharin
1999-11-13 18:35 ` Tim Prince
1999-11-30 23:28 ` Zakharin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Zakharin @ 1999-11-13 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: help-gcc
How much disk space should be required to compile (make) GCC 2.95.1 under
Linux? I have added 150 MB to the partition just for that and still run out
of diskspace during make bootstrap. Alternatively, is there a binary
distribution for i686 (or lower) Linux?
Thanks,
Boris Zakharin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Compiling GCC 2.95.1
1999-11-13 16:27 Compiling GCC 2.95.1 Zakharin
@ 1999-11-13 18:35 ` Tim Prince
1999-11-13 19:26 ` Zakharin
1999-11-30 23:28 ` Tim Prince
1999-11-30 23:28 ` Zakharin
1 sibling, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tim Prince @ 1999-11-13 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: help-gcc
>How much disk space should be required to compile (make) GCC 2.95.1 under
>Linux? I have added 150 MB to the partition just for that and still run out
>of diskspace during make bootstrap.
That may be enough for make bootstrap-lean, if you build c only during
bootstrap, following up by adding only the additional languages you want. Why
not use 2.95.2?
Tim Prince
tprince@computer.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Compiling GCC 2.95.1
1999-11-13 18:35 ` Tim Prince
@ 1999-11-13 19:26 ` Zakharin
1999-11-30 23:28 ` Zakharin
1999-11-30 23:28 ` Tim Prince
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Zakharin @ 1999-11-13 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: help-gcc
The only reason I am trying to compile 2.95.1 is because I have downloaded
it a while back and only got around to trying to install it recently, so I
didn't want to redownload. I can make more space available to compile if I
know how much is required. I would still prefer a binary distribution,
though.
Thanks,
Boris Zakharin
Tim Prince <n8tm@aol.comnojunk> wrote in message
news: 19991113213241.08214.00001379@ng-fi1.aol.com ...
> That may be enough for make bootstrap-lean, if you build c only during
> bootstrap, following up by adding only the additional languages you want.
Why
> not use 2.95.2?
> Tim Prince
> tprince@computer.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Compiling GCC 2.95.1
1999-11-13 16:27 Compiling GCC 2.95.1 Zakharin
1999-11-13 18:35 ` Tim Prince
@ 1999-11-30 23:28 ` Zakharin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Zakharin @ 1999-11-30 23:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: help-gcc
How much disk space should be required to compile (make) GCC 2.95.1 under
Linux? I have added 150 MB to the partition just for that and still run out
of diskspace during make bootstrap. Alternatively, is there a binary
distribution for i686 (or lower) Linux?
Thanks,
Boris Zakharin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Compiling GCC 2.95.1
1999-11-13 18:35 ` Tim Prince
1999-11-13 19:26 ` Zakharin
@ 1999-11-30 23:28 ` Tim Prince
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tim Prince @ 1999-11-30 23:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: help-gcc
>How much disk space should be required to compile (make) GCC 2.95.1 under
>Linux? I have added 150 MB to the partition just for that and still run out
>of diskspace during make bootstrap.
That may be enough for make bootstrap-lean, if you build c only during
bootstrap, following up by adding only the additional languages you want. Why
not use 2.95.2?
Tim Prince
tprince@computer.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Compiling GCC 2.95.1
1999-11-13 19:26 ` Zakharin
@ 1999-11-30 23:28 ` Zakharin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Zakharin @ 1999-11-30 23:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: help-gcc
The only reason I am trying to compile 2.95.1 is because I have downloaded
it a while back and only got around to trying to install it recently, so I
didn't want to redownload. I can make more space available to compile if I
know how much is required. I would still prefer a binary distribution,
though.
Thanks,
Boris Zakharin
Tim Prince <n8tm@aol.comnojunk> wrote in message
news: 19991113213241.08214.00001379@ng-fi1.aol.com ...
> That may be enough for make bootstrap-lean, if you build c only during
> bootstrap, following up by adding only the additional languages you want.
Why
> not use 2.95.2?
> Tim Prince
> tprince@computer.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1999-11-30 23:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1999-11-13 16:27 Compiling GCC 2.95.1 Zakharin
1999-11-13 18:35 ` Tim Prince
1999-11-13 19:26 ` Zakharin
1999-11-30 23:28 ` Zakharin
1999-11-30 23:28 ` Tim Prince
1999-11-30 23:28 ` Zakharin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).