From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: andyb@ieee.org
To: help-gcc@gnu.org
Subject: gcc 2.91.66 broken??
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 22:24:00 -0000
Message-ID: <8252j3$ld2$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-SW-Source: 1999-12n/msg00015.html
Message-ID: <19991231222400.-SM7ZtpufjiQpA_EdorXrfmYCIZ2SMTpwoJ8HHjTTCM@z>

gcc 2.91.66 Linux Redhat 6.1

I'm trying to link in a static library, using every option known to gcc
and ld, however nothing I do seems to override dynamic linking.  If I
put the full pathname to the static library (libc.a) it does link it in,
however it also links in the dynamic version (libc.so).  Is this a bug?
Is this why my program crashes before it gets to main()?

In case you're wondering, libc.a contains "xstat", libc.so does not.

Thank you for any insight!!!

-  Andy

P.S.  If there is a libc.so that does contain the xstat definition (text
segment) I'd appreciate knowing what version, that might also be an
acceptable way to get over this particular hump.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.