From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12709 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2002 03:17:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12665 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2002 03:17:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU) (128.250.1.22) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Jun 2002 03:17:19 -0000 Received: from hg.cs.mu.oz.au (hg.cs.mu.OZ.AU [128.250.25.19]) by mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU with ESMTP id NAA23519; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 13:17:16 +1000 (EST) Received: (from fjh@localhost) by hg.cs.mu.oz.au (8.10.2/8.10.2/SuSE Linux 8.10.0-0.3) id g5D3HGH03125; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 13:17:16 +1000 Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 20:17:00 -0000 From: Fergus Henderson To: David T-G Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: why would two copies of gcc-2.95.2 yield different output? Message-ID: <20020613131716.B3069@hg.cs.mu.oz.au> References: <20020612190043.GZ17198@justpickone.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020612190043.GZ17198@justpickone.org>; from davidtg@justpickone.org on Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 02:00:43PM -0500 X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00107.txt.bz2 On 12-Jun-2002, David T-G wrote: > Is there perhaps a way for a mere mortal to reverse-engineer the binaries > and see what the differences are? Use objdump (from the GNU binutils package). -- Fergus Henderson | "I have always known that the pursuit The University of Melbourne | of excellence is a lethal habit" WWW: | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.