From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21879 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2002 13:00:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21856 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2002 13:00:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO inaccessnetworks.com) (212.205.200.118) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Oct 2002 13:00:21 -0000 Received: from priv.inaccessnetworks.com (host5.inaccessnetworks.com [212.205.200.117]) by inaccessnetworks.com (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g9LCxh8a031624; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:59:43 +0300 Received: (from npat@localhost) by priv.inaccessnetworks.com (8.12.1/8.12.1) id g9LCxhrV023006; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:59:43 +0300 Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 06:00:00 -0000 From: Nick Patavalis To: tobias@fresco.org Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Subject: gcc 3.1 produces bus errors on arm-linux Message-ID: <20021021125942.GA21689@orion.priv.inaccessnetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00238.txt.bz2 Hi, I was scanning mailing lists for something related to my problem, and came upon a posting by Tobias Hunger at the gcc-help mailing list (31 Jul 2002, http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2002-07/msg00296.html) The problem I'm witnessing is exactly the same as the one described in the above-mentioned post (trying to run any binary that requires a glibc 2.2.[35] compiled with gcc 3.1, causes a segfault; static binaries work fine). Since from the followups at the list I could not see any resolution, I tought I'd write to ask if any progress has been made with this. Thanks in advance /npat Nick Patavalis inAccess Networks S.A. -- A commune is where people join together to share their lack of wealth. -- Richard M. Stallman