From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3866 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2002 18:04:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3859 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2002 18:04:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Oct 2002 18:04:13 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9LHgxw14271; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 13:42:59 -0400 Received: from porcupine.cygnus.com (vpn50-33.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.33]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9LI3xf11294; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 14:03:59 -0400 Received: from porcupine (law@localhost) by porcupine.cygnus.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) with ESMTP id g9LIDFsk000651; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 12:13:17 -0600 Message-Id: <200210211813.g9LIDFsk000651@porcupine.cygnus.com> To: "Venkatakrishnan, V" cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: law@redhat.com Subject: Re: Use +z or +Z to recompile... In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 21 Oct 2002 13:55:42 EDT." <8229C4577A00D511ABC00090277A45A0012361B3@us0111-ch-ms1.sdi.xcdg.xerox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:04:00 -0000 From: Jeff Law X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00255.txt.bz2 In message <8229C4577A00D511ABC00090277A45A0012361B3@us0111-ch-ms1.sdi.xcdg.xer ox.com>, "Venkatakrishnan, V" writes: >Ah I see, now that I am using it during linking as well it worked, thanks >Jeff :). >But how come it wasn't sufficient to use it during compile only, why >explicitly at link as well?? Because code is also generated at link time to handle static constructors and destructors. jeff