* RE: Has anyone got the patch for gcc2.95.2/glibc2.2 ?
[not found] <616BE6A276E3714788D2AC35C40CD18DA270C8@whale.softwire.co.uk>
@ 2003-02-05 11:10 ` Rupert Wood
2003-02-05 16:17 ` Huw Lynes
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rupert Wood @ 2003-02-05 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Huw Lynes'; +Cc: gcc-help
Huw,
> For legacy reasons I need to build a copy of gcc2.95.2 on a
> RedHat7.2 box (glibc 2.2.4-29). It falls over during the compile.
> Having done a bit of googling I find mention of a patch for
> gcc2.95.2 to make it compatible with glibc2.2
I don't have the patch, sorry, but a few quick thoughts:
* doesn't RedHat 7.x have gcc 2.95.x installed as kgcc? I don't
think the original gcc 2.96 could build the Linux kernel
* the patch probably found its way into gcc 2.95.3 or the
the gcc 2.95.4 prerelease in CVS (not obviously marked in the
changelog, though) - you could try one of those instead.
Good luck,
Rup.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Has anyone got the patch for gcc2.95.2/glibc2.2 ?
2003-02-05 11:10 ` Has anyone got the patch for gcc2.95.2/glibc2.2 ? Rupert Wood
@ 2003-02-05 16:17 ` Huw Lynes
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Huw Lynes @ 2003-02-05 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-help
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 11:10:34 -0000
"Rupert Wood" <me@rupey.net> wrote:
> * doesn't RedHat 7.x have gcc 2.95.x installed as kgcc? I don't
> think the original gcc 2.96 could build the Linux kernel
kgcc is egcs-6.2-1.1.2.16 , I get confused by the whole egcs/gcc thing and can't remeber where this version fits in.
> * the patch probably found its way into gcc 2.95.3 or the
> the gcc 2.95.4 prerelease in CVS (not obviously marked in the
> changelog, though) - you could try one of those instead.
Managed to build 2.95.3, will see if that meets our requirements.
Thanks for you help,
Huw
--
| Huw Lynes | The Moving Picture Company |
| System Administrator | 127 Wardour Street |
|.........................| London, W1F 0NL |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Has anyone got the patch for gcc2.95.2/glibc2.2 ?
2003-02-05 10:11 How to supress this warning Matthias Oltmanns
@ 2003-02-05 11:01 ` Huw Lynes
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Huw Lynes @ 2003-02-05 11:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-help
For legacy reasons I need to build a copy of gcc2.95.2 on a RedHat7.2 box (glibc 2.2.4-29). It falls over during the compile. Having done a bit of googling I find mention of a patch for gcc2.95.2 to make it compatible with glibc2.2
The only links to this patch I can find are dead.
I'm hoping someone has a copy of this patch and can post it.
Thanks,
Huw
--
| Huw Lynes | The Moving Picture Company |
| System Administrator | 127 Wardour Street |
|.........................| London, W1F 0NL |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-02-05 16:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <616BE6A276E3714788D2AC35C40CD18DA270C8@whale.softwire.co.uk>
2003-02-05 11:10 ` Has anyone got the patch for gcc2.95.2/glibc2.2 ? Rupert Wood
2003-02-05 16:17 ` Huw Lynes
2003-02-05 10:11 How to supress this warning Matthias Oltmanns
2003-02-05 11:01 ` Has anyone got the patch for gcc2.95.2/glibc2.2 ? Huw Lynes
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).