From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29518 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2003 21:55:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29353 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2003 21:55:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (12.150.115.133) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Mar 2003 21:55:25 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2KLlel13874; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 16:47:40 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2KLtHQ06993; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 16:55:17 -0500 Received: from frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.27]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2KLtG514536; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 13:55:16 -0800 Received: from frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h2KLtGK9002129; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 13:55:16 -0800 Received: (from rth@localhost) by frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.7/8.12.7/Submit) id h2KLtFpe002127; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 13:55:15 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: frothingslosh.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 00:21:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Jonathan Larmour Cc: Fergus Henderson , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: __thread Message-ID: <20030320215515.GD2006@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Henderson , Jonathan Larmour , Fergus Henderson , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org References: <3E7A0A68.1000902@eCosCentric.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E7A0A68.1000902@eCosCentric.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00252.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 06:37:28PM +0000, Jonathan Larmour wrote: > May I suggest that GCC extensions be labelled as such, e.g. __gcc_thread ? No. Not the least of reasons being that we're implementing a multi-vendor extension. r~