From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6493 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2003 11:30:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6486 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2003 11:30:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO i3s.net) (24.219.4.129) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Apr 2003 11:30:58 -0000 Received: from cyberia.lemings.com (unverified [24.219.116.230]) by i3s.net (Rockliffe SMTPRA 4.5.4) with ESMTP id ; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 05:30:58 -0600 Received: from cyberia.lemings.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cyberia.lemings.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h35BTB4M001282; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 04:29:12 -0700 Received: (from elemings@localhost) by cyberia.lemings.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h35BTBGE001280; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 04:29:11 -0700 Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 11:30:00 -0000 From: Eric Lemings Message-Id: <200304051129.h35BTBGE001280@cyberia.lemings.com> To: eljay@adobe.com, nathan@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: Const in default function arguments? Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00042.txt.bz2 That's a bit different. The type of the default argument here is T&. In the original post, the type is T.