From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-help-return-15358-listarch-gcc-help=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31501 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2004 20:40:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31490 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2004 20:40:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO web41102.mail.yahoo.com) (66.218.93.18)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Jan 2004 20:40:57 -0000
Message-ID: <20040123204055.60606.qmail@web41102.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [128.12.51.83] by web41102.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:40:55 PST
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 20:40:00 -0000
From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: gcc3.2.x, or gcc3.3.x, or gcc3.4
To: Phil.Crescioli@gd-ais.com
Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00216.txt.bz2

For SPARC, I'd strongly recommend gcc 3.3.2 over 3.2.x
since it has many SPARC specific bugfixes.

Dara

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/