From: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Native GNAT (Ada) Support
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 14:16:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040901141556.GA28421@white> (raw)
Hi,
I was wondering about the quality of the Ada support in the gcc 3.4.
Is it considered to be as stable as an official GNAT release?
(For example gcc 3.4 vs Gnat 3.14p)
Is the quality of the Ada support considered when making an official
release of gcc? Or is only the C and C++ and other mainline languages
considered?
I'm considering to use gcc's native ada support instead of using Gnat's
versions (3.14p) of the software.
Thanks,
Bob Rossi
reply other threads:[~2004-09-01 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040901141556.GA28421@white \
--to=bob@brasko.net \
--cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).