From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12130 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2005 21:48:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12112 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Sep 2005 21:48:18 -0000 Received: from v6.netlin.pl (HELO pointblue.com.pl) (62.121.136.6) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 21:48:18 +0000 Received: by pointblue.com.pl (Postfix, from userid 65534) id D5BFB2343; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 23:48:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.222] (unknown [195.225.250.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pointblue.com.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFDA6286 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 23:48:13 +0200 (CEST) From: Tommy Vercetti To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Subject: C++ operators in gcc Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 21:48:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.91 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509232348.08931@gj-laptop> X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00174.txt.bz2 Hi list I was told that gcc by default, for every class creates operator =, and probably something else. This makes binary file bit larger than it suppose to be. Is it true, and if so, why this is the case ? Can gcc simply not generate that operator? please CC me on replies. -- Vercetti