From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-help-return-22090-listarch-gcc-help=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29577 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2005 23:31:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 29529 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Nov 2005 23:31:15 -0000
Received: from mailfe06.swip.net (HELO swip.net) (212.247.154.161)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 23:31:15 +0000
X-T2-Posting-ID: 2yF4ydxc0UI9xI7FHZPfog==
Received: from 83.72.134.122.ip.tele2adsl.dk ([83.72.134.122] verified)
  by mailfe06.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.1)
  with ESMTP id 12970827; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 00:31:12 +0100
From: Frans Englich <frans.englich@telia.com>
To: "Steven L. Zook" <SLZook@qualstar.com>
Subject: Re: False positive warning: missing return statement and switch statements
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 23:31:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.50
Cc: "MSX to GCC" <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <9E27B4AB55478346B9F7848926E49B7F011128A5@exchange1.qualstar.com>
In-Reply-To: <9E27B4AB55478346B9F7848926E49B7F011128A5@exchange1.qualstar.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200511152342.18829.frans.englich@telia.com>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00233.txt.bz2

On Tuesday 15 November 2005 23:26, Steven L. Zook wrote:
[...]

> I guess that the compiler writers have a very difficult choice in these
> kind of warnings between under and over warning. Their choice may not
> work well for you.

Yes, what a tricky(and flame catching) task of designing warnings. If only it 
was possible to please all.


Cheers,

		Frans