public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: insn
@ 2008-03-07 18:50 Bill McEnaney
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Bill McEnaney @ 2008-03-07 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Segher Boessenkool, aparna, gcc-help

Why not write "inst" instead "insn?"  

> > pls tell what exactly  insn means.
> 
> "insn" means "instruction".  Inside of GCC, we talk so much about
> instructions that it is a lot easier to say "insns", just like you
> say "pls" instead of "please".
> 
> 
> Segher
> 
> 

________________________________________________________________
Please visit a saintly hero:
http://www.jakemoore.org

And a boy with a wonderful wish:
http://shaneswish.com/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: insn
  2008-03-07  7:24 insn aparna
  2008-03-07 18:40 ` insn Segher Boessenkool
@ 2008-03-08  2:17 ` Ian Lance Taylor
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ian Lance Taylor @ 2008-03-08  2:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: aparna; +Cc: gcc-help

aparna@cse.iitb.ac.in writes:

>       can group of instructions can combine to form a isns?pls tell what
> exactly  insn means.
> in program, there is a outer for loop where it takes each insn in progm
> and inner for loop, for each definition in the insn. that means there are
> many instruction in a insn.

An insn can be a PARALLEL, which can contain several different
operations executed in parallel.

An insn can be a SEQUENCE, which can contain several different insns
in a branch delay sequence.

These are documented in the friendly manual, q.v.

Ian

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: insn
@ 2008-03-07 19:24 Bill McEnaney
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Bill McEnaney @ 2008-03-07 19:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bill McEnaney, Segher Boessenkool, aparna, gcc-help


Thanks, folks.

Bill

> Why not write "inst" instead "insn?"  
> 
> > > pls tell what exactly  insn means.
> > 
> > "insn" means "instruction".  Inside of GCC, we talk so much about
> > instructions that it is a lot easier to say "insns", just like you
> > say "pls" instead of "please".
> > 
> > 
> > Segher
> > 
> > 
> 
> ________________________________________________________________
> Please visit a saintly hero:
> http://www.jakemoore.org
> 
> And a boy with a wonderful wish:
> http://shaneswish.com/
> 
> 
> 

________________________________________________________________
Please visit a saintly hero:
http://www.jakemoore.org

And a boy with a wonderful wish:
http://shaneswish.com/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: insn
  2008-03-07 18:50 insn Bill McEnaney
@ 2008-03-07 19:02 ` Tom St Denis
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tom St Denis @ 2008-03-07 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bill McEnaney; +Cc: Segher Boessenkool, aparna, gcc-help

Bill McEnaney wrote:
> Why not write "inst" instead "insn?"  
>   

Because inst could be short for instance.  Insn is fairly obvious if you 
read GCC code.

top post.
Also don't

Tom

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: insn
@ 2008-03-07 18:50 Bill McEnaney
  2008-03-07 19:02 ` insn Tom St Denis
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Bill McEnaney @ 2008-03-07 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Segher Boessenkool, aparna, gcc-help

Why not write "inst" instead "insn?"  

> > pls tell what exactly  insn means.
> 
> "insn" means "instruction".  Inside of GCC, we talk so much about
> instructions that it is a lot easier to say "insns", just like you
> say "pls" instead of "please".
> 
> 
> Segher
> 
> 

________________________________________________________________
Please visit a saintly hero:
http://www.jakemoore.org

And a boy with a wonderful wish:
http://shaneswish.com/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: insn
  2008-03-07  7:24 insn aparna
@ 2008-03-07 18:40 ` Segher Boessenkool
  2008-03-08  2:17 ` insn Ian Lance Taylor
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Segher Boessenkool @ 2008-03-07 18:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: aparna; +Cc: gcc-help

> pls tell what exactly  insn means.

"insn" means "instruction".  Inside of GCC, we talk so much about
instructions that it is a lot easier to say "insns", just like you
say "pls" instead of "please".


Segher

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* insn
@ 2008-03-07  7:24 aparna
  2008-03-07 18:40 ` insn Segher Boessenkool
  2008-03-08  2:17 ` insn Ian Lance Taylor
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: aparna @ 2008-03-07  7:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-help

hi,

      can group of instructions can combine to form a isns?pls tell what
exactly  insn means.
in program, there is a outer for loop where it takes each insn in progm
and inner for loop, for each definition in the insn. that means there are
many instruction in a insn.

thanks and regards

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-03-08  2:17 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-03-07 18:50 insn Bill McEnaney
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-03-07 19:24 insn Bill McEnaney
2008-03-07 18:50 insn Bill McEnaney
2008-03-07 19:02 ` insn Tom St Denis
2008-03-07  7:24 insn aparna
2008-03-07 18:40 ` insn Segher Boessenkool
2008-03-08  2:17 ` insn Ian Lance Taylor

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).