public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Krischik <krischik@users.sourceforge.net>
To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: On the C99 Status
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:18:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200803221824.12543.krischik@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11b141710803220508q29483a6fr8d09c61bda062893@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1545 bytes --]

Am Samstag 22 März 2008 schrieb Paulo J. Matos:

> The other possibility is that gcc,
> as a big software beast, is getting so big that adding completely new
> features might be quite hard... 

I thing this is close - but in a much grander scale - Most of the other 
available C compiler don't have C99 support either.

I think that C as a language is getting such a big language beast on such 
small foundations that adding completely new features is be quite hard. This 
is what you get when you build on to weak foundations.

Note that the features you mentioned have been available for in - in for 
example Ada - for over ten  years (complex numbers ) or 20 years (variable 
length arrays) now - and they have been implemented by the compiler vendors.

I mention Ada because this is where good foundation come into play. When Ada 
came out it was dismissed for been to heavy and difficult - while C was so 
light and elegant.

Now 20 years later and see what happened: The Ada front end of GCC 4.3 
implements Ada 2007 in full - only a year after the standard was finalised 
while the C front end - with a lot lot more maintainers  working on - still 
has not got C99 implemented - That's 8 years late! And ISO standards are 
renewed every 10 years - so C 2009 should be around the corner now.

As I said: the foundations of C are to weak (Read an original first printing 
K&R to see what I mean) - they can not hold and more features. 

Martin

-- 
Martin Krischik
mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 194 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-22 18:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-22 12:09 Paulo J. Matos
2008-03-22 18:18 ` Martin Krischik [this message]
2008-03-22 18:53   ` Luke A. Guest
2008-03-23  8:18     ` Martin Krischik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200803221824.12543.krischik@users.sourceforge.net \
    --to=krischik@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).