public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Torquil Macdonald Sørensen" <torquil@gmail.com>
To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Optimization and double comparison
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 21:41:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200808042334.05408.torquil@gmail.com> (raw)

Hi, is it expected that the attached program only works when no optimization 
is used? I do not understand why the if-test is ever entered in this program. 
The variables that are compared should be exactly the same, since one is used 
to set the value of the other another place in the program. I will attach the 
whole program below.

In short, how can it be that an if-test of the following form can print two 
exactly equal numbers?:

if( a != b) {
	cout << setprecision(70);
	cout << a << " " << b << endl;
} 

Btw, I know that normally one should do a comparison within a certain error 
when comparing doubles, but I am only interested in how the if-test above can 
print two equal numbers?

Here is the program (the if-test is entered when N=4, but not when N=2,3). In 
short, first pot[m][n] is set using calc(m,n), but afterwards the if-test says 
that they are different, if I compile with -O1:

#include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>

using namespace std;

const int M = 2, N = 4;

double calc(const int m, const int n)
{
	double pot = 0.0;
	for(int n2 = 0; n2 < n; ++n2) {
		pot += 0.1;
	}
	return(pot);
}

void check(double pot[][N])
{
	for(int m = 0; m != M; ++m) {
		for(int n = 0; n != N; ++n) {
			cout << "n = " << n << endl;
			if( calc(m,n) != pot[m][n] ) {
				cout << "Error!" << endl;
				cout << setprecision(70);
				cout << pot[m][n] << " and " << calc(m,n) << endl;
			}
		}
	}
}

int main()
{
	double pot[M][N];

	for(int m = 0; m != M; ++m) {
		for(int n = 0; n != N; ++n) {
			pot[m][n] = calc(m,n);
		}
	}

	check(pot);

	return(0);
}

             reply	other threads:[~2008-08-04 21:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-04 21:41 Torquil Macdonald Sørensen [this message]
2008-08-04 22:21 ` Brian Dessent
2008-08-05  8:19   ` Torquil Macdonald Sørensen
2008-08-05 15:22     ` Bob Plantz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200808042334.05408.torquil@gmail.com \
    --to=torquil@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).