From: rohitgeek <rohit23taneja@gmail.com>
To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization options not working
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 05:09:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <27714100.post@talk.nabble.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20100301050900.tYMuZ7oGFwLk21sK6gnWx6G-xBwAaphdNC4_ahZWcgc@z> (raw)
I will try to be descriptive this time .
This is test.c
main()
{
int a,b,c;
a= 5;
b=10;
d=30;
c= a*b + 30 ;
}
now , suppose i build gcc for an ARM processor.
After build, compile stage ---
with no optimization options as mentioned above, this is what i get in
assembly.
.file "test1234.c"
.text
.align 2
.global main
.type main, %function
main:
@ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 16
@ frame_needed = 1, uses_anonymous_args = 0
mov ip, sp
stmfd sp!, {fp, ip, lr, pc}
sub fp, ip, #4
sub sp, sp, #16
mov r3, #5
str r3, [fp, #-28]
mov r3, #10
str r3, [fp, #-24]
mov r3, #30
str r3, [fp, #-16]
ldr r2, [fp, #-28]
ldr r3, [fp, #-24]
mul r1, r3, r2
mov r3, r1
mov r2, r3, asl #2
mov r3, r2, asl #5
rsb r3, r2, r3
add r3, r3, r1
mov r2, r3, asl #2
add r3, r3, r2
mov r3, r3, asl #4
add r3, r3, #299008
add r3, r3, #992
str r3, [fp, #-20]
sub sp, fp, #12
ldmfd sp, {fp, sp, pc}
.size main, .-main
with optimization option turned on (mentioned in command line)
assembly :-
.file "test1234.c"
.text
.align 2
.global main
.type main, %function
main:
@ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0
@ frame_needed = 0, uses_anonymous_args = 0
@ link register save eliminated.
bx lr
.size main, .-main
Did i missed something during building time?
Also bringing into notice the point of single instruction generation instead
of 2 instructions (multiply and accumulate), what part of gcc will do it and
how to proceed regarding that.
Thanks
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/optimization-options-not-working-tp27637400p27714100.html
Sent from the gcc - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
next prev reply other threads:[~2010-03-01 5:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-18 12:08 rohitgeek
2010-02-18 13:46 ` Andrew Haley
2010-02-19 19:07 ` rohitgeek
2010-02-23 18:19 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2010-02-24 5:21 ` rohitgeek [this message]
2010-02-24 14:11 ` rohitgeek
2010-02-24 18:28 ` Andrew Haley
2010-03-01 5:09 ` rohitgeek
2010-03-01 15:27 ` John S. Fine
2010-03-01 21:21 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2010-03-02 4:57 ` rohitgeek
2010-03-02 8:32 ` Cedric Roux
2010-03-02 12:44 ` rohitgeek
2010-02-24 5:23 ` rohitgeek
2010-02-24 5:23 ` rohitgeek
2010-02-24 5:26 ` rohitgeek
2010-02-24 5:27 ` rohitgeek
2010-02-24 5:32 ` rohitgeek
2010-02-24 9:30 ` rohitgeek
2010-02-24 9:18 ` rohitgeek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=27714100.post@talk.nabble.com \
--to=rohit23taneja@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).