From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-help-return-47662-listarch-gcc-help=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7820 invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2011 21:49:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 7810 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Sep 2011 21:49:39 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr (HELO smtp5-g21.free.fr) (212.27.42.5)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 21:49:25 +0000
Received: from heffalump.sk2.org (unknown [82.228.207.51])	by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E9C2D48050;	Sun, 25 Sep 2011 23:49:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from steve by heffalump.sk2.org with local (Exim 4.76)	(envelope-from <steve@sk2.org>)	id 1R7wZX-0000Vw-TQ; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 23:49:15 +0200
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:07:00 -0000
From: Stephen Kitt <steve@sk2.org>
To: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>,	632003-done@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Bin Tian <tianbin@cernet.edu.cn>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>,	gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Bug#632003: Finding dlltool using gcc
Message-ID: <20110925214915.GH1526@sk2.org>
References: <20110921055036.GE7506@sk2.org> <mcr62km7zxu.fsf@coign.corp.google.com> <4E7BE89F.5020902@cernet.edu.cn> <20110923190324.GL15478@yellowpig>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20110923190324.GL15478@yellowpig>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-help.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg00205.txt.bz2

Hi,

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 09:03:24PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 10:02:07AM +0800, Bin Tian wrote:
> > On 2011年09月21日 22:06, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > >Stephen Kitt<steve@sk2.org>  writes:
> > >
> > >>Is there a recommended approach to use to find dlltool using only
> > >>i686-w64-mingw32-gcc?
> > >
> > >I don't know of one.  I don't know why avoiding autoconf is desirable.
> > >However, if I were forced to do so, I would probably use gcc -v to get
> > >the target name and look for TARGET-dlltool that way.
> > gcc -dumpmachine is more relavant.
> 
> Yes, gcc -dumpmachine reports the right value, thanks a lot for the suggestion

Thank you all for your input, sine the "-dumpmachine" suggestion seems
acceptable I'm closing this bug.

Best regards,

Stephen