From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3989 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2011 01:56:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 3977 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Nov 2011 01:56:05 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_WX X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from lo.gmane.org (HELO lo.gmane.org) (80.91.229.12) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 01:55:50 +0000 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RM90V-0002UX-Dh for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 02:55:47 +0100 Received: from 71-17-69-121.yktn.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca ([71.17.69.121]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 02:55:47 +0100 Received: from dirtyepic by 71-17-69-121.yktn.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 02:55:47 +0100 To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: CLooG version for trunk Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 01:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20111103200533.1d208b76@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/mdsNb7ZjlPJkAQED9MRIi2_"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00033.txt.bz2 --Sig_/mdsNb7ZjlPJkAQED9MRIi2_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1225 Very late in stage 1 of 4.6 development an attempt was made to change the default version of CLooG needed for graphite support from the cloog-ppl (0.15) branch to the official CLooG (0.16) releases with the ISL backend. I believe it was rejected because of lack of testing - a change like that should have been made earlier in stage 1 to ensure any regressions were caught. Now here we are late in stage 1 of 4.7 development and again I see no chang= es made in this area. Did I miss them or are we going to be stuck with cloog-ppl for another release cycle? As ppl continues to develop, maintaining cloog-ppl gets to be more of a burden, and it appears everyone involved with graphite in GCC is using the ISL backend. It's hard enough to get graphite bugs fixed in the branch they're reported in, so much so that I've stopped reporting them. If the development team isn't even using the same libraries and backends as the users then I don't see how the situation can improve. --=20 fonts, gcc-porting, it makes no sense how it makes no sense toolchain, wxwidgets but i'll take it free anytime @ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 06= 62 --Sig_/mdsNb7ZjlPJkAQED9MRIi2_ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-length: 198 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk6zSG0ACgkQiqiDRvmkBmJHcwCg6KRo6vegLJWt7pjgu1PN1zG1 HPAAoODJ7BTql59u4/Xr3joFpkQXQok+ =Thsj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/mdsNb7ZjlPJkAQED9MRIi2_--