From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@vinc17.org>
To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Floating point performance issue
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:40:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111226143911.GN5641@xvii.vinc17.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EF87E08.4080308@aol.com>
On 2011-12-26 09:00:40 -0500, Tim Prince wrote:
> True, in the case where left-to-right evaluation is not over-ruled by
> parens. However, certain compilers which ignore parens also have no
> reliable left-to-right or right-to-left evaluation rules.
OK. These compilers should really be avoided (at least to compile
3rd-party code).
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arénaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-26 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-20 9:52 Ico
2011-12-20 10:05 ` Marcin Mirosław
2011-12-20 10:20 ` Ico
2011-12-20 10:34 ` Jonathan Wakely
2011-12-20 10:43 ` Ico
2011-12-20 11:24 ` Vincent Lefevre
2011-12-20 11:51 ` Dario Saccavino
2011-12-20 12:02 ` Ico
2011-12-20 12:12 ` Vincent Lefevre
2011-12-20 12:28 ` Tim Prince
2011-12-20 12:43 ` Segher Boessenkool
2011-12-20 13:02 ` Vincent Lefevre
2011-12-20 19:51 ` Segher Boessenkool
2011-12-20 21:02 ` Vincent Lefevre
2011-12-21 4:36 ` Segher Boessenkool
2011-12-21 6:15 ` Segher Boessenkool
2011-12-23 20:25 ` Vincent Lefevre
2011-12-20 13:43 ` David Brown
2011-12-20 13:58 ` Vincent Lefevre
2011-12-20 14:25 ` David Brown
2011-12-20 15:05 ` Vincent Lefevre
2011-12-20 15:44 ` David Brown
2011-12-20 16:18 ` Vincent Lefevre
2011-12-20 22:32 ` David Brown
2011-12-23 20:11 ` Vincent Lefevre
2011-12-24 7:38 ` Vincent Lefevre
2011-12-24 11:11 ` David Brown
2011-12-26 1:15 ` Vincent Lefevre
2011-12-26 11:48 ` David Brown
2011-12-26 13:07 ` Vincent Lefevre
2011-12-26 13:37 ` Tim Prince
2011-12-26 14:01 ` Vincent Lefevre
2011-12-26 14:39 ` Tim Prince
2011-12-26 16:40 ` Vincent Lefevre [this message]
2011-12-21 1:19 ` Miles Bader
2011-12-21 2:19 ` David Brown
2011-12-21 4:03 ` Miles Bader
2011-12-21 8:32 ` David Brown
2011-12-21 9:02 ` Miles Bader
2011-12-21 9:23 ` David Brown
2011-12-21 11:58 ` Miles Bader
2011-12-21 16:49 ` David Brown
2011-12-22 3:23 ` Miles Bader
2011-12-23 21:15 ` Vincent Lefevre
2011-12-24 17:18 ` David Brown
2011-12-26 8:12 ` Vincent Lefevre
2011-12-26 13:00 ` David Brown
2011-12-26 13:22 ` Vincent Lefevre
2011-12-20 15:45 ` Jeff Kenton
2011-12-20 11:44 ` David Brown
2011-12-20 11:49 ` David Brown
2011-12-20 10:46 ` Marc Glisse
2011-12-20 11:11 ` Ico
2011-12-20 11:16 ` Vincent Lefevre
2011-12-20 12:00 ` Vincent Lefevre
2011-12-20 12:21 ` Tim Prince
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111226143911.GN5641@xvii.vinc17.org \
--to=vincent+gcc@vinc17.org \
--cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).