From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@vinc17.org>
To: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>,
Neha Gowda <neha.gnu.gcc@gmail.com>,
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Should rand() return a RAND_MAX value for 32 bit target?
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:05:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180920150550.GA4852@cventin.lip.ens-lyon.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180920144238.GB24856@cventin.lip.ens-lyon.fr>
Actually, there may be a bug with -m32:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <float.h>
int main (void)
{
float f = 2147483646;
printf ("FLT_EVAL_METHOD = %d\n", (int) FLT_EVAL_METHOD);
if (f == 2147483647)
{
printf("%.20g\n", (double) f);
}
return 0;
}
$ gcc -std=c99 -m32 -O tst.c -o tst
$ ./tst
FLT_EVAL_METHOD = 2
2147483648
Since FLT_EVAL_METHOD = 2, float_t is long double, thus shouldn't
2147483647 be converted to long double directly (as f is regarded
as an operand of type long double), so that the result of the
equality test should be false?
The C standard says for FLT_EVAL_METHOD = 2: "evaluate all operations
and constants to the range and precision of the long double type".
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Converting f first to float is contrary to the idea behind
FLT_EVAL_METHOD = 2, which is to avoid loss of precision in
intermediate operations.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-20 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-18 12:22 Neha Gowda
2018-09-18 13:09 ` Xi Ruoyao
2018-09-18 13:17 ` Xi Ruoyao
2018-09-18 13:49 ` Jonathan Wakely
2018-09-18 13:46 ` Andrew Haley
2018-09-20 14:42 ` Vincent Lefevre
2018-09-20 15:05 ` Vincent Lefevre [this message]
2018-09-20 15:21 ` Liu Hao
2018-09-20 15:58 ` Vincent Lefevre
2018-09-20 16:12 ` Vincent Lefevre
2018-09-21 2:49 ` Liu Hao
2018-09-22 8:17 ` Vincent Lefevre
2018-09-22 10:08 ` Vincent Lefevre
2018-09-22 13:52 ` Liu Hao
2018-09-22 22:12 ` Vincent Lefevre
2018-09-20 15:46 ` Dennis Clarke
2018-09-20 16:16 ` Vincent Lefevre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180920150550.GA4852@cventin.lip.ens-lyon.fr \
--to=vincent+gcc@vinc17.org \
--cc=aph@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=neha.gnu.gcc@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).