public inbox for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Adrian Moreno <amorenoz@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Ring <stefanrin@gmail.com>, gcc-help <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: broken code only when optimized "-O2"
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 10:39:50 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211221163950.GA614@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0210178a-c875-fcbd-009f-5f438a098709@redhat.com>

On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 05:13:08PM +0100, Adrian Moreno via Gcc-help wrote:
> On 12/21/21 17:05, Stefan Ring wrote:
> >On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 4:40 PM Adrian Moreno via Gcc-help
> ><gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>I'd really appreciate any hint or idea to try to understand this problem.
> >
> >I guess the compiler doesn't like the dereferencing of uninitialized
> >pointers (in the sizeof expressions). I am not 100% sure that this
> >counts as dereferencing, but I would assume so. Because of this the
> >compiler will be free to behave however it likes to.
> 
> I agree that doesn't look good. Replacing them by sizeof (struct ___) 
> expressions does not change the behavior though.

As required by C.  6.3.2.1/2:
  Except when it is the operand of the sizeof operator, [...], an lvalue
  that does not have array type is converted to the value stored in the
  designated object (and is no longer an lvalue); this is called lvalue
  conversion.

There is no dereferencing.


Segher

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-21 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-21 15:40 Adrian Moreno
2021-12-21 16:05 ` Stefan Ring
2021-12-21 16:13   ` Adrian Moreno
2021-12-21 16:39     ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2021-12-21 17:05   ` David Brown
2021-12-22  9:24     ` Adrian Moreno
2021-12-22 10:27       ` Florian Weimer
2021-12-22 10:34         ` Adrian Moreno
2021-12-22 10:36           ` Xi Ruoyao
2021-12-22 16:05             ` Adrian Moreno
2021-12-22 15:32 ` LIU Hao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211221163950.GA614@gate.crashing.org \
    --to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=amorenoz@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=stefanrin@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).