From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F063858405
 for <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2022 12:01:39 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org F2F063858405
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none)
 header.from=kernel.crashing.org
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel.crashing.org
Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 22UC0dJj018648;
 Wed, 30 Mar 2022 07:00:39 -0500
Received: (from segher@localhost)
 by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 22UC0dN2018645;
 Wed, 30 Mar 2022 07:00:39 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to
 segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 07:00:38 -0500
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Zopolis0 <creatorsmithmdt@gmail.com>
Cc: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@mengyan1223.wang>, gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Multiple descriptions for fassert in gcc/d/lang.opt and
 gcc/java/lang.opt
Message-ID: <20220330120038.GT614@gate.crashing.org>
References: <CAEYL+X8Qo-zNW69+Kh5X_Yip7=KLvAwoQKx0SMMko8B4jVP0Dg@mail.gmail.com>
 <12a5e21f1432b767709e423315fb8081e4e447bd.camel@mengyan1223.wang>
 <CAEYL+X8p0xBHYQv=kRygo+vqY9aF+rZ=U+53Y0xZmma=+sqS8w@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAEYL+X8p0xBHYQv=kRygo+vqY9aF+rZ=U+53Y0xZmma=+sqS8w@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-help mailing list <gcc-help.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-help>,
 <mailto:gcc-help-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-help/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-help-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-help>,
 <mailto:gcc-help-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 12:01:41 -0000

On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 08:32:04PM +1100, Zopolis0 via Gcc-help wrote:
> I was asking in gcc-help because this isn't an error related to gcj
> specifically, as it applies to any scenarios where there are multiple
> definitions for the same thing in different lang.opt files.

You can look at how d/lang.opt handles this for its conflicts with C.
Warning: it is very underwhelming :-)  It does require the documentation
to be the same for both languages, which probably is a good idea anyway.


Segher