From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5834 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2009 16:21:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 5826 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Feb 2009 16:21:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from exprod6og115.obsmtp.com (HELO exprod6og115.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.35) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:21:47 +0000 Received: from source ([192.150.8.22]) by exprod6ob115.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKSZ7YifEFB7GcCgqyAnFxfSAHSyXiBxaj@postini.com; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:21:47 PST Received: from inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com ([153.32.1.51]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id n1KGLQE0025669; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:21:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from nacas02.corp.adobe.com (nacas02.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.100]) by inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id n1KGLQiq027312; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:21:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from nambx04.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.127.98]) by nacas02.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.100]) with mapi; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:21:26 -0800 From: "John (Eljay) Love-Jensen" To: Eivind LM , "gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org" Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:21:00 -0000 Subject: RE: Where did the warning go? Message-ID: <204DEA5423F3BF47A6EE88C4E2979EC66BE32F038B@nambx04.corp.adobe.com> References: <204DEA5423F3BF47A6EE88C4E2979EC66BE32F0370@nambx04.corp.adobe.com> , In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2 Hi Eivind, > Next question: Does the -Wall flag have a long and complicated history? T= he name indicates that it enables ... well, uh, ... *all* warnings. (Yes, i= should have read the docs more carefully.) One might think that "-Wall" is all warnings. But it is not. Maybe a bett= er name would be "-Wselect-popular-warnings". > Is there a way to enable absolutely all? -Weverything? :) No. You have to enable the warnings one-by-one. The -Wall and -Wextra wil= l enable sets of warnings en masse. It would be nice to have a -Wall-and-I-mean-it-dammit-this-time-with-feelin= g for the toggle warnings (precluding the parameter warnings). Then you co= uld -Wno-conversion opt-out of the warnings as you see fit, explicitly. Bu= t, alas, that's not available Sincerely, --Eljay