From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2613 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2010 12:04:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 2596 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Feb 2010 12:04:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from kuber.nabble.com (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:03:49 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ni56h-0001nE-55 for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 04:03:47 -0800 Message-ID: <27637400.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:08:00 -0000 From: rohitgeek To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Subject: optimization options not working MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00265.txt.bz2 Hi , I am a newbie in compilers, recently came across a problem that when i try to use optimization options( -O_ ) during compilation , i do not get the asembly for the processor that i am porting gcc to. Is there a simple thing i am missing somewhere? Secondly, are there some macros i need to define in regard with optimization. Kindly clarify the doubts and provide any other basic information that i need to have regarding optimizations, specifically peephole. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/optimization-options-not-working-tp27637400p27637400.html Sent from the gcc - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.