From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xry111@xry111.site>
Received: from xry111.site (xry111.site [89.208.246.23])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12A1A3858C51
 for <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 18 May 2022 11:02:02 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 12A1A3858C51
Received: from [192.168.124.21] (unknown [113.140.11.3])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest
 SHA384) (Client did not present a certificate)
 (Authenticated sender: xry111@xry111.site)
 by xry111.site (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 00F4F667A6;
 Wed, 18 May 2022 07:01:59 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <296056e130d014c20b4d55e9b4b036db13dcb1d2.camel@xry111.site>
Subject: Re: Segfault in libjava/prims.cc while compiling gcj
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>, Zopolis0
 <creatorsmithmdt@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc-help <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 19:01:57 +0800
In-Reply-To: <CAH6eHdSXqzyskB0UHrLCGzkU2nt1dP9VPQ43V-vg+ACK95H8wQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEYL+X9rxt7PJVZazDOZg6s7krp+D-oyvNFo9QfBW9R-hCmGqQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <98a68a34c0d95c812b49f471df3ff3d32e0bea8d.camel@xry111.site>
 <CAEYL+X9ruU+=NebkpNtjZ+Dg7bLtBCk5bntk4dJgqDx24jiw8w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAH6eHdTfb3c38JRqcx27PdXY9OBYW9aRFy=QkTUOh4CZjUkbqw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEYL+X8605ZxAmvc1tjiBB-AkeG0bH5DnYvFq560swDzS9LMZg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAH6eHdSXqzyskB0UHrLCGzkU2nt1dP9VPQ43V-vg+ACK95H8wQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.44.1 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD,
 LIKELY_SPAM_FROM, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, SPF_HELO_PASS,
 SPF_PASS, TXREP,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-help mailing list <gcc-help.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-help>,
 <mailto:gcc-help-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-help/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-help-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-help>,
 <mailto:gcc-help-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 11:02:03 -0000

On Wed, 2022-05-18 at 11:57 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Wed, 18 May 2022 at 11:45, Zopolis0 wrote:
> >=20
> > I thought "=C2=A0 But "-D...", "-I...", and "-B..." shall be
> > removed." was asking me to remove them.
> >=20
> > I used -E, I said I produced the file.
>=20
> Ah I missed that, sorry. I thought you were still trying to produce a
> .ii file.

My mistake: I didn't expect that this .ii file contains "extern Java {
... }", not supported by GCC trunk.

So for the OP, the only option seems to reduce the .ii file into a test
case and debug the compiler.  I guess the OP has made some mistake
implementing "extern Java" for C++ FE.
--=20
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University