From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-help-return-21313-listarch-gcc-help=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23346 invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2005 04:45:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23306 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Aug 2005 04:45:06 -0000
Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.162.197)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 04:45:06 +0000
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id n1so485319nzf
        for <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 21:45:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.33.9 with SMTP id g9mr521656nzg;
        Sat, 27 Aug 2005 21:45:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.37.22.44 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 21:45:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <2e393d08050827214525510965@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 04:45:00 -0000
From: corey taylor <corey.taylor@gmail.com>
To: gkajmowi@tbaytel.net
Subject: Re: Problems with temporaries and C++ spec
Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <200508271604.35552.gkajmowi@tbaytel.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <200508271604.35552.gkajmowi@tbaytel.net>
X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg00271.txt.bz2

Why are you using a private copy constructor there in the first place?

corey

On 8/27/05, Garrett Kajmowicz <gkajmowi@tbaytel.net> wrote:
> I'm working on my own C++ library for embedded applications (cxx.uclibc.o=
rg)
> and while implementing valarray I came across a problem with private copy
> contructors.  The following code works in GCC 3.3.5, but not in GCC 3.4.2
>=20
> #include <iostream>
>=20
> class copy_to;
>=20
> class hidden_copying{
> public:
>         friend class copy_to;
>         friend class copy_from;
>=20
> private:
>         hidden_copying() : q(0) {  }
>         hidden_copying(const hidden_copying &);
>         hidden_copying & operator=3D(const hidden_copying &);
>         int q;
> };
>=20
> class copy_to{
> public:
>         friend class copy_from;
>         copy_to() : p (0) { }
>         copy_to(const hidden_copying & h) : p(h.q) {  }
>         int getval() const{
>                 return p;
>         }
> private:
>         int p;
> };
>=20
> class copy_from{
> public:
>         friend class hidden_copying;
>         copy_from() : r(0) {  }
>         copy_from(const int i) : r(i) {  }
>         copy_from(const copy_from & f) : r(f.r) {  }
>         hidden_copying data() const{
>                 hidden_copying retval;
>                 retval.q =3D r;
>                 return retval;
>         }
>=20
> private:
>         int r;
> };
>=20
>=20
> int main(){
>         copy_from a(5);
>         copy_to b(a.data());
>         std::cout << "Value of copy_to: " << b.getval() << std::endl;
>         return 0;
> }
>=20
> With gcc 3.4.2 I receive the following error message:
> ../temporarytest.cpp: In function `int main()':
> ../temporarytest.cpp:12: error: `hidden_copying::hidden_copying(const
> hidden_copying&)' is private
> ../temporarytest.cpp:48: error: within this context
>=20
> Without breaking valarray spec (in the above case, amounting to making an=
y of
> the copy constructors of hidden_copying public), how can I get the above =
code
> work work properly.   If There is no way, than please explain how to
> reconsile behaviors with spec definition of std::slice_array.
>=20
> Thank you for your help.
>=20
> -     Garrett
>